Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #421  
Old 10-11-2013, 12:04 PM
ECV56_Guevara ECV56_Guevara is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Planeta Trampa
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha View Post
Works ok my end

Can you be more specific ie:

Aircraft type
Payload
Coop/Dogfight
Map

Thxz
All maps, all payloads,all Aircraft, coop. Aviar explain it better than me:



Quote:
Originally Posted by Aviar View Post
This has been around for at least a couple of patches. So many players have killed themselves in my coops because they did not set the delay BEFORE EVERY MISSION. (I believe it only happens when 'Bomb Fuzes' is not activated.) Even if there is a value in the Delay box, you should always enter it again, as it resets to zero when you leave the arming screen if you don't.

Previously, your delay setting was always saved. It's not like that any more. Maybe DT can fix it one day.

Aviar
This!
__________________

Bombing smurfs since a long time ago...
Reply With Quote
  #422  
Old 10-11-2013, 02:34 PM
idefix44's Avatar
idefix44 idefix44 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: France
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
It is launched with the client.

I have never used the dedicated server.

Sorry for the confusion.
No problem Sir.

Thx.
Reply With Quote
  #423  
Old 10-11-2013, 02:44 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
It is launched with the client.

I have never used the dedicated server.

Sorry for the confusion.
I think that's the key thing here. In user land its fine but with a dedicated server and a client joining there are problems.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #424  
Old 10-11-2013, 05:10 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

The dedicated server is the problem with V1's
Reply With Quote
  #425  
Old 10-11-2013, 05:11 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ECV56_Guevara View Post
All maps, all payloads,all Aircraft, coop. Aviar explain it better than me:
!
Ok server setting with bomb fuses off, I only use fuses on so never see the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #426  
Old 10-14-2013, 08:09 PM
sniperton sniperton is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aviar View Post
I have also noticed inconsistencies when placing runway tiles over original tiles. When you run the mission several times, sometimes they appear on top of the originals and sometimes they appear under the originals.
I'm just curious whether such bugs are planned to be fixed in the close future in a hotfix (4.12.2?), or we should wait until 4.13 comes out next (?) year?
Reply With Quote
  #427  
Old 10-25-2013, 07:20 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Ki-43 III wing tank fires initially produce flames but no smoke, then smoke but no flame.

Additionally, fires in the wing tanks don't seem to further damage the plane's wings or cause risk of explosion, nor do they trigger a bailout by AI pilots.
Reply With Quote
  #428  
Old 10-26-2013, 01:41 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
Ki-43 III wing tank fires initially produce flames but no smoke, then smoke but no flame.

Additionally, fires in the wing tanks don't seem to further damage the plane's wings or cause risk of explosion, nor do they trigger a bailout by AI pilots.
I believe this is normal behavior as of 4.12. The intention is to replicate those times when there is a fire but its clean burning and there is no smoke... sometimes the fire goes out (in a dive for example) and then there is just smoke left over as the fire goes out... its not perfect but its not bad either.

If there is more damage done then the fire with no smoke turns into a fire with smoke and thats when all sorts of bad things happen
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #429  
Old 10-27-2013, 08:20 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
I believe this is normal behavior as of 4.12. The intention is to replicate those times when there is a fire but its clean burning and there is no smoke...
That just seems strange, since a gasoline fire is normally at least a bit smoky. Also, even for a pure fuel fire there will usually be other things like paint and rubber from the self-sealing fuel tanks burning.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
If there is more damage done then the fire with no smoke turns into a fire with smoke and thats when all sorts of bad things happen
I've subsequently seen this. Heavy damage to the wings plus more severe fire also triggers bailout.
Reply With Quote
  #430  
Old 10-27-2013, 09:21 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Is it just me and my crummy flying or does the P-40M seem extremely vulnerable to "critical hits"?

I've been flying a lot of 1-1 missions against the Ace AI Ki-43II (i.e., 2 0.50 caliber guns, sniper-like accuracy within 200 meters) and it seems like even a single second of gunfire will do something terrible to my plane.

If I'm lucky it's just a jammed gun, more typically it's some control surface rendered inoperative, a pilot hit or really severe engine damage which results in the engine conking out within seconds. Mind you, the actual plane never breaks apart - or even shows heavy damage, it's almost always a pilot kill, messed up controls (usually 2-3 at a time) or inoperative/flaming engine.

This seems at odds with Clive Caldwell's assessment that the P-40 "would take a tremendous amount of punishment, violent aerobatics as well as enemy action," plus the fact that the P-40 had armor around the engine and cockpit which allowed it to survive head-on passes against the Ki-43.

Mind you, I think that the game gets the P-40's basic ruggedness right in terms of light damage/heavy damage/broken damage modeling to the airframe. It's just that there seems to be something wrong about the likelihood and severity of critical hits.

Flying against another contemporary opponent, the Bf-109F, I'm getting much the same sort of damage, although the Bf-109's programming makes it much less likely to take head-on shots and Bf-109F Ace AI doesn't seem to have the same inerrant accuracy as the Ki-43.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.