Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 02-11-2012, 06:24 PM
SPAD-1949 SPAD-1949 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 124
Default

Another for me unpleasant behaviour comes with the new starting positions.
Even if I set myself als flight leader, AI starts up engines and immediately give full throttle for a liftoff. My assigned wingman should be so polite to wait until I give full throttle.
Within this theme Complex I made another oservation about the accelerating behaviour of AI.
First thes accelerate like living hell then just sleep away so I can overtake them easily on the runway.
Also I could not manage to place a spawning object for me on the airfield compex. I allways start at the usual starting point, while my flight uses their spawning planes.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 02-11-2012, 10:13 PM
Aviar's Avatar
Aviar Aviar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPAD-1949 View Post
Also I could not manage to place a spawning object for me on the airfield compex. I allways start at the usual starting point, while my flight uses their spawning planes.

Here is an example of how to set up a 2-plane flight:

-Set your Takeoff Type to Pairs or Line. (See screenshot 1)

-Set your Spawn Point for each plane in the flight. (See screenshots 2 and 3)

Now any human taking a plane in that flight will spawn where you see the Stationary P-38's. If a plane is AI controlled, it will spawn at the Takeoff waypoint, so be careful where you place it.

Aviar
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Takeoff Type.jpg (1.24 MB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg Spawn Point 1.jpg (1.30 MB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg Spawn Point 2.jpg (1.30 MB, 18 views)
__________________
Intel i7-4790 4-Core @3.60GHz
Asus Z97-C Motherboard
16GB DDR-3 1600 SDRAM @800 MHz
NVIDIA GTX 760 - 2GB
Creative SB ZX SBX
Logitech X-530 5.1 Speakers
27" AOC LED - 2752
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
CH FighterStick-Pro Throttle-Pro Pedals
Logitech G13 Gameboard
GoFlight GF-T8 Module
WIN 8.1
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 02-11-2012, 10:54 PM
SPAD-1949 SPAD-1949 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 124
Default

Tried it, did not work. Is this only für Multiplayer Mode? I assign my spawn point to an Avatar plane on the Field, but spawn at the regular starting point on the runway.
And while I sat up a mission to try it again, i found another light flaw, as it seems to me.
If trying to land the FW190 there is a real hardship getting out speed and height our of this slick AC. Cuting the throttle means reduction in sound. With engine idle, it takes about two minutes to reduce speed from 400kph to 300kph while remaining on the same level. Even skidding does not work to well. Pulling hard up setting all flaps and gear out adds several hundret meters on level and pointing the nose towards the airfield means a real hardship staying below 250kph. with 4.10 I could land this AC with 170kph, now its nearly impossible to bleed speed below 220kph. Forcing a landing with damaged machine in vicinity of the airfield is nearly impossible because you have to stay so long in the line of fire when reducing speed. Historical correct? Or is it just me?
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 02-12-2012, 03:14 AM
Aviar's Avatar
Aviar Aviar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 545
Default

SPAD-1949,

You didn't mention if you were asking about single or Coop missions. I assumed you were making a coop.

If the 'Pairs' or 'Line' setting is not working, try the Normal setting. It's strange because this feature seems to work differently in Single and Coop missions.

*If you post the mission here and tell me exactly what you are trying to do, it would be much easier to show you.

Aviar
__________________
Intel i7-4790 4-Core @3.60GHz
Asus Z97-C Motherboard
16GB DDR-3 1600 SDRAM @800 MHz
NVIDIA GTX 760 - 2GB
Creative SB ZX SBX
Logitech X-530 5.1 Speakers
27" AOC LED - 2752
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
CH FighterStick-Pro Throttle-Pro Pedals
Logitech G13 Gameboard
GoFlight GF-T8 Module
WIN 8.1

Last edited by Aviar; 02-12-2012 at 03:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 02-12-2012, 03:40 PM
FC99's Avatar
FC99 FC99 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ra'Kaan View Post
Actually, I agree!

I really want to be sure the devs saw this in my last post -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ra'Kaan
I'm not critisizing, just posting my observations.
You can criticize us, why not? As long as critic is polite and constructive it helps us to make the game better. AI is complex and it's impossible for a single person to try and experience everything that is possible in game.That's why users input and opinions means a lot for us.

We have already made a lot of changes for 4.11.1 that have been initiated in this thread and we will continue to do that.

FC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 02-12-2012, 04:07 PM
Lagarto Lagarto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 236
Default

Something should be done about the unrealistically high losses among the AI. I see several solutions:

1) a/c with damaged engine(s) should immediately break off / turn back and try to reach friendly lines; now they press on until it’s too late.
2) AI is no good at finding a suitable place for emergency landings, I often see them crash into forests.
3) Their strafing technique is suicidal – when attacking target they actually throttle back (!), then slowly pull up and orbit their target, instead of speeding away at full bore just above the ground, like all real-life strafers did.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 02-12-2012, 07:16 PM
Luno13 Luno13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 370
Default

DT have mentioned that ground attack patterns will be re-worked. You make a good point with the rest. Furthermore, some AI should chose to break off, even without receiving damage (hit and run tactics or when losing the initial advantage, etc).
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 02-13-2012, 10:16 AM
SPAD-1949 SPAD-1949 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aviar View Post
SPAD-1949,

You didn't mention if you were asking about single or Coop missions. I assumed you were making a coop.
I beg you pardon, single missions
Quote:
If the 'Pairs' or 'Line' setting is not working, try the Normal setting. It's strange because this feature seems to work differently in Single and Coop missions.
Now that you mention it, I reconfigured the set and it works. Even to start out of the camo net boxes which usually result in a collision, when trying to park beneath.
Quote:

*If you post the mission here and tell me exactly what you are trying to do, it would be much easier to show you.
You mean, copy the .mis file text here or is ther a possibility to share files?
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 02-13-2012, 04:57 PM
Aviar's Avatar
Aviar Aviar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 545
Default

Yes, you can simply post the contents of your mis file or you can compress the mission files into a Zip and then attach it to your post.

Aviar
__________________
Intel i7-4790 4-Core @3.60GHz
Asus Z97-C Motherboard
16GB DDR-3 1600 SDRAM @800 MHz
NVIDIA GTX 760 - 2GB
Creative SB ZX SBX
Logitech X-530 5.1 Speakers
27" AOC LED - 2752
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
CH FighterStick-Pro Throttle-Pro Pedals
Logitech G13 Gameboard
GoFlight GF-T8 Module
WIN 8.1
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 02-15-2012, 06:03 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

I'm noticing that the Ace AI seems to be too willing to trade head-on shots with well-armed enemy AC, rather than maneuvering for position.

While "playing chicken" makes sense for well-armed and armored planes which aren't very fast or maneuverable, like the IL2, it makes no sense for more vulnerable planes with good maneuverability, such as the A6M2, Bf-109E/F or IK3.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.