Re: Office site

fld88 · #1 09-09-2009, 06:24 PM

Armored Princess is a 1C Company site and it is far their first game. Good grief no wonder you’re making such excuses if you think they would have to test every card. They don’t have to do that. They would simply have to poll their beta testers. Even if they only had the nVidea and Intel specs they wouldn’t have to test every ATI card—that is a ridiculous notion.

If I was buying today I would buy Intel for sure and probably nVidea after some research, but for now I have an aging AMD/ATI box. I ran KB fine but Armored Princess has a vague spec recommendation of a 3 GHz processor and some nVidea card I don’t know about so does this mean I can forgot trying to run it with my 2.41 GHz AMD.

Nokturnal · #2 09-10-2009, 12:56 AM

Check the site again mate, the developers are Katauri Interactive, their only other game, King's Bounty. 1C are only the publishers.
I suggest in the future you actually check things before claiming them.

Also, even if we were to assume 1C was the only company behind this, you are still comparing them to the likes of EA and Bioware?..Which still doesn't make sense.

I never said they would have to test every card, i was just exaggerating when i said they wouldn't be able to test them all because i am making a point that the company is small and they would of simply picked a generic set of requirements (which they did) knowing full well that people out there are capable of searching themselves, as you've said you can do.

You still overlooked the fact that there would be 10-20x as much money/time spent on Dragon Age, so it's clear that you are just here to complain for the sake of complaining.
I'm not going to continue this, you can google the answer you need, so do it.

fld88 · #3 09-10-2009, 04:59 PM

So you only want to include the publisher when it is convenient for you LOL. You cannot claim EA is behind Dragonage but try to say 1C is not behind Armored Princess. Both sites are branded by the publishers. Bioware is bigger than Katauri but they are minuscule compared to EA. But all that is moot, I don't care what size of company Katauri or IC is, there is no excuse for such vague specs. Video specs are irrelevant to my business but I develop software systems alone and I do not give specs that vague.

Mandea · #4 09-11-2009, 07:00 AM

come on, I have a 8600GT with a E8400 and the first game ran smoothly in 1600*1200 with AA and AF. there is nothing to worry, even a 4670series from ATI (not to mention 3850 3870 etc) will be just fine.
This isn't Crysis

Nike-it · #5 09-11-2009, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mandea

come on, I have a 8600GT with a E8400 and the first game ran smoothly in 1600*1200 with AA and AF. there is nothing to worry, even a 4670series from ATI (not to mention 3850 3870 etc) will be just fine.
This isn't Crysis

Armored Princess is better optimised then The Legend. For example on my laptop with ATI HD2600 I was able to play The Legend only on average settings, but AP runs ok on Max.

fld88 · #6 09-11-2009, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nike-it

Armored Princess is better optimised then The Legand. For example on my laptop with ATI HD2600 I was able to play The Legend only on average settings, but AP runs ok on Max.

I ran KB on MAX with only a few hiccups so that is good to know. But what is the poster in the Mods for Armored Princess forum talking about when asking about mods for speeding up the slower combat in AP?

It would also mean that the recommened spec of a 3 GHz processor is not actually necessary.