Suggesting to devs

P-51 · #1 08-04-2009, 07:21 PM

Actualy i think its a mk.II in the demo! and thats DLC not update...

Abbevilleboy · #2 08-04-2009, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P-51

Actualy i think its a mk.II in the demo! and thats DLC not update...

It may well be meant to be a MkII but it looks like a Vb - that's the problem. And while I appreciate the demo is just an early look it doesn't bode well for the full game to make such an elementary mistake in my opinion.

Ironman69 · #3 08-04-2009, 07:35 PM

Anton, can you confirm whether or not the machine guns on the allied planes are de-synced ? A big problem with IL2 was that the allied guns were in sync when firing when they should of been firing one at a time in rapid order.

Anton Yudintsev · #4 08-04-2009, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ironman69

Anton, can you confirm whether or not the machine guns on the allied planes are de-synced ? A big problem with IL2 was that the allied guns were in sync when firing when they should of been firing one at a time in rapid order.

They are in sync.

Ironman69 · #5 08-04-2009, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anton Yudintsev

They are in sync.

Does BoP model the recoil effect of the machine guns firing? In IL2, the incorrect sync of the machine guns of allied planes created alot of adverse yaw and instability. Oleg finally fixed this but it was very late in coming. Just a suggestion to you. Pay no attention to it if it's not gonna be a problem of instability in BoP.

Abbevilleboy · #6 08-04-2009, 07:35 PM

Hey Guilty - nice landing!

I agree, belly landings should be all part of the experience. After all, during the Battle of Britain it was pilot shortage that was the problem, not aircraft production. A pilot could walk away from that and be up fighting again within hours, therefore shouldn't count as a failed attempt.