Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2016, 11:13 PM
CzechTexan CzechTexan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: north-central Texas
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
I did extensive testing of the DM for all the planes in the game last winter.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=229446
ah, good to see the testing has been done!

IMO I still think the Ki-27 is tougher than it should be.
Quoting you: "For example, the Ki-43 series is far more durable than the A6M series."

It's true the Ki-43 is tougher and I'd have to say that so is the Ki-27. They should be flaming easier.
And, if a plane's wingtanks are on fire, they should not keep flying forever.

Thanks for the testing, Pursuivant. We can only hope the models get fixed for better realism.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-24-2016, 12:20 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CzechTexan View Post
IMO I still think the Ki-27 is tougher than it should be.
Sadly, reworking DM so that they match the high quality of the FM in the game would require a huge amount of effort, almost a new game. It's a shame that IL2 was so careful with its flight models, but its damage models are so mediocre and so error-ridden.

I think that the Ki-27, A6M2, and Ki-43-I, being roughly contemporary planes, mostly built to higher pre-war quality standards, from the same materials, should all be equally vulnerable in the fuselage, stabilizers or wings. But that it should be much tougher to break wings, stabilizers, or fuselages on any plane due to damage alone (vs. damage from G forces + battle damage). Planes are big machines which are built to take extreme forces; putting a few small holes in them usually isn't going to make them fall apart.

The Ki-27, A6M2, and Ki-43-I are all desperately vulnerable to fuel tank hits, which is realistic, except for the fact that it should require a minimum of 2 bullets - one explosive or incendiary - to start any fuel fire. Also, since all three planes had wing fuel tanks right next to the wing spar, fuel fires or explosions should quickly cause wing failure, as well as injury to the pilot.

All three planes are also extremely vulnerable to crew hits, which is also realistic.

Fix the errors in the Ki-27's DM, and make all three planes approximately equal in ability to absorb engine, airframe, and control surface damage, and I'll be happy.

Last edited by Pursuivant; 08-24-2016 at 12:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2016, 06:39 AM
Nil's Avatar
Nil Nil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 124
Default

I confirm, the ki27 is bouncing, dancing on the tarmac!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.