Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-09-2016, 08:06 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

i try to cover as widely as possible by that pit ... that plane can use for USAF ( i hope ) RAF and even by lendlease in VVS
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2016, 11:29 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
i try to cover as widely as possible by that pit ... that plane can use for USAF ( i hope ) RAF and even by lendlease in VVS
That makes sense, since many C-47 were supplied to US Allies.

But, if I understand correctly, the main modifications to Lend-Lease aircraft were to guns and ordinance, which don't apply in the case of the C-47/Dakota.

Speaking of modifying the C-47, please take a look into the fragility of the aircraft's DM, which is one of the most vulnerable in the game.

While the airframe wasn't stressed to survive high G loads, it was otherwise fairly durable, as attested by the large numbers of DC-3/Ex C-47/C-53 aircraft still in operational use well after WW2.

Also, take a look at this Victoria Cross citation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lord

Note that Lord was able to fly his burning Dakota for approximately 8 minutes(!) before the fire caused the wing to collapse.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-2016, 10:22 AM
SaQSoN SaQSoN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nowhereland
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
But, if I understand correctly, the main modifications to Lend-Lease aircraft were to guns and ordinance, which don't apply in the case of the C-47/Dakota.
I am not sure about British, but C-47, supplied to the USSR were not modified in any way and were used as cargo aircraft.

USSR, however, manufactured it's own versions of the plane: PS-84, which was license-built version of DC-3 and Li-2, which was altered to have internal bomb bays, bombardier equipment, MG turret and forward firing fixed MG. The later was produced both fitted with military equipment, and without it, but with possibility to be retrofitted with it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2016, 12:07 PM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

it's a pure C-47 from USSR VVS with original instruments ..
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 0_4938b_b71c99ac_XXL.jpg (196.3 KB, 17 views)
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-10-2016, 01:00 PM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

same plane ...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 0_49386_291fad95_XXL.jpg (156.5 KB, 20 views)
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-10-2016, 01:23 PM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

and as final of long holidays ...





__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-10-2016, 02:45 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Gorgeous!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-10-2016, 03:17 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaQSoN View Post
I am not sure about British, but C-47, supplied to the USSR were not modified in any way and were used as cargo aircraft.
I'm not sure about lend-lease planes to the UK, either. From 1939-41 the RAF bought many US-built planes outright, and often demanded lots of detail changes to the basic airframe (e.g. Buffalo Mk I vs. B-239).

After Lend-Lease started I get the sense that the RAF had to take US planes with fewer modifications. Either that or there was close enough harmonization between the US and the UK that the RAF didn't need to specify changes.

In any case there's very little reason to add a proper RAF Dakota to the game, since the only obvious change would be to a few gauges and placards in the cockpit.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-11-2016, 03:20 PM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

can you help me once again ...

can you read or compare nameplates with annotation for it ...

do i correct read it? plus few name plate a can't read ...


__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-11-2016, 08:09 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Spelling is correct for all panels.

Second panel right side mystery word (for switchs 13 & 14) is "Off".

Mystery word for switch 10 might be "stwd'ss" (abbreviation of "stewardess")

I have to wonder if the panels you're looking at aren't from the DC-3, which might have had slightly different systems than the C-47.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.