Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2014, 08:39 AM
gaunt1 gaunt1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: India
Posts: 314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
btw its still unclosed question ... just like He177 ...

that guy now seating without job ... and i think that it's opportunity for IL2 community to get a B17 ... or any othet model ...
Do-217 cockpit!!!! Please!!

Or if you mean new planes, then Me-410 or Spitfire XIV!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-08-2014, 11:53 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaunt1 View Post


Do-217 cockpit!!!! Please!!

Or if you mean new planes, then Me-410 or Spitfire XIV!
Or cockpits for any other plane that doesn't yet have one, especially any of the late-war Italian fighters.

Seriously, a cockpit for a single-engined plane would be a manageable project for a professional 3D artist working on his own.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2014, 03:35 PM
ECV56_Guevara ECV56_Guevara is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Planeta Trampa
Posts: 248
Default

Manage a project like collect funds, hiring a modeller etc..could be hard. I think it s a better option support actual project:
https://sites.google.com/site/he177a3r2greif/
The fastest it is made, the fastest we can try another one.
When this will be finished, maybe we could ask the same project managers to try again, they have an invaluabel experience doing this.


By the way: what a nice video rommel!!!
DT could you briing us more info about the actual state of development of airborne radar?
Sorry if my english isnt ok.
__________________

Bombing smurfs since a long time ago...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-08-2014, 04:39 PM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ECV56_Guevara View Post
Manage a project like collect funds, hiring a modeller etc..could be hard. I think it s a better option support actual project:
https://sites.google.com/site/he177a3r2greif/
The fastest it is made, the fastest we can try another one.
When this will be finished, maybe we could ask the same project managers to try again, they have an invaluabel experience doing this.
i know modeller... which now seating without job ... can do everything you want ... we can hire him ... he already have expirience in work for Il2 1946 ...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-08-2014, 06:33 PM
stugumby stugumby is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 384
Default Im looking forward to all the good things to come

it seems we are about to be blessed with more goodness from TD! Im gonna really have to train hard to use those newer bombsights, some of it looks similar and others will take a while to master. hopefully there will be training vids for them in game or on you tube shortly after release. Im definitely gonna have to rethink my keys assignments.

More good things await, im thinking positive and would really like to thank TD for their efforts, as a mission builder I can only imagine the endless testing and what iffing they go through to bring us this content for free and on their own time. Many players dont realize what a 40 min mission entailed, sometimes up to 5 or more hours to tweak and make it feasable.
And just for curiosity what exactly is a ju88a5 late, im at the wikipedia level for my basic data since all my squadron books got water damaged years ago. And P-1 is a 75mm gun attack plane, C series is heavy fighters?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-09-2014, 01:40 AM
JG601_Rommel JG601_Rommel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ECV56_Guevara View Post
By the way: what a nice video rommel!!!
DT could you briing us more info about the actual state of development of airborne radar?
Sorry if my english isnt ok.
http://www.panzerkampfwagen.cz/forum...80#post_229893
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-09-2014, 04:50 PM
ECV56_Guevara ECV56_Guevara is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Planeta Trampa
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG601_Rommel View Post
ty rommel, but my czech isnt very good lately


Can anyone translate please?
__________________

Bombing smurfs since a long time ago...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-10-2014, 07:08 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ECV56_Guevara View Post
ty rommel, but my czech isnt very good lately


Can anyone translate please?
Google Translate is your friend (sort of).

Not really much to report that's not in the video, other than reporting that the mod initially had four variants of the FuG 220 radar, and that some unofficial work has been done on a cockpit for the Lancaster bomber.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-10-2014, 03:38 PM
ECV56_Guevara ECV56_Guevara is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Planeta Trampa
Posts: 248
Default

Thanks Pursuivant. Yes,sort of... Google translate is awfull translasting to spanish. And also with English I guess, so sometimes is easy to lost the original sense of a post, that s why I allways choose to translate direct from english or ask for a direct translation.


DT: Show us the Lanc please please please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________

Bombing smurfs since a long time ago...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-11-2014, 06:56 AM
Baddington_VA Baddington_VA is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
what exactly is a ju88a5 late, im at the wikipedia level for my basic data since all my squadron books got water damaged years ago. And P-1 is a 75mm gun attack plane, C series is heavy fighters?
Found some references to the JU88 types.

The Ju88A5 series had a greater wingspan and larger bombload capacity than the A4. Because of this it was slower than the A4.
Can't find a description of a late A5, but usually it's an adaptation to overcome the performance shortcomings of the regular model.
The A5 is also depicted as having an extra forward MG in the nose glazing.

The A6 is depicted as carrying balloon cable cutting device across the front.
It is described as unwieldy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.