![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
"..... it is their intention ......" That is planned. Just have to love the selective reading of Brain and Kurfurst. So Brain, the Shackelton, powered by Griffons, used 25lb boost. So, 610 Sqn never saw combat, LOL. Can you tell me of any other a/c that lost a prop blade that wouldn't cause an engine to destruct? Oh wait, German a/c never would. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The one with silly comments that contribute nothing is you Brain.
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
R. Dennis:
"All our machines were fitted with Rotol airscrews when the maximum rpm were increased to 3,850 from 3,700 and boost to +13 from +11, as the DeHaviland airscrew could not absorb the added power and more than once shed a blade, with somewhat detrimental effects on the engine!" |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There may be documents somewhere that say they did, but so far I haven't seen any quoted text in this thread that says they did. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reverted? I would like to see they even used +13lbs at all before we start talking about reverting LOL
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
So Brain, what other engines would not suffer detrimental damaged from loosing a prop blade. LOL, even your LW increased the prop blade size on their a/c when extra power was developed from the engines. |
![]() |
|
|