Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > Cryostasis

Cryostasis First-person shooter meets survival horror set on a frozen Soviet ice-breaker trapped in the ice on the North Pole.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2008, 06:46 AM
Jon Jon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 109
Default

I'm very impressed. The atmosphere, the artistic design and technology of the graphics, is exceptional. The structure of the game is very original. Finally, a great FPS / Survival linear style from the CIS! . I played a little bit, I do not understand the Russian language, but it is one of the best beginnings of this style of a video game I've seen.! I could not stop playing!

The begining is awersome , and is more a survival game than a FPS .
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2008, 07:14 AM
SwedKnoT SwedKnoT is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 131
Default

Is februray 13th the release date in europe?

On a swedish site they say so at least.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2008, 08:15 AM
BAXTER STOCKMAN BAXTER STOCKMAN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Greece
Posts: 443
Default

I will get it soon. @jon: what pc do you have? And does it runs fine on max settigs? Does it have enough blood and violence??
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2008, 09:45 AM
B.F. B.F. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Russia, Novosibirsk
Posts: 69
Default

I purchase game yesterday.
I had a Pentium E5200(3.32Ghz),2gb ram,GF8800GS 382Mb, SB Audigy2.
The game is realy hungry about videocard power.
On my PC I had only 10-25 fps on 1024x768 max settings with aa-off.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2008, 09:47 AM
BAXTER STOCKMAN BAXTER STOCKMAN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Greece
Posts: 443
Default

8800 gt is more powerful than 8800gs so it will run faster on mine pc right?

Is it playble with 15-25 fps???


Is it only hungry about video card or it also hungry for cpu power??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-06-2008, 09:52 AM
B.F. B.F. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Russia, Novosibirsk
Posts: 69
Default

I don't know about cpu.
Mine is enough.
Try to run game on XP and Vista (I had both) and it seems it more stable on XP with SM3 support.
Game is playable in most cases, but it had a few places were I had to lower my settings to play.

Last edited by B.F.; 12-06-2008 at 09:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-06-2008, 09:58 AM
BAXTER STOCKMAN BAXTER STOCKMAN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Greece
Posts: 443
Default

all games are more stable on xp. And in most games gpu is more important than cpu. I will never use vista because it sucks. Did you get 25 fps on xp or vista? Even if my cpu is not enough my gpu will be enough i think. It is Way more powerful than the 8800 gs.. Hope that my cpu will be enough because if not then i will be forced to overclock it and mayve burn it!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-06-2008, 10:03 AM
B.F. B.F. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Russia, Novosibirsk
Posts: 69
Default

I think so too.

And about game itself.
This is a coldest game ever.
Cold fear and Lost Planet is a kindergarten level after Cryostasis. ^___^
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-06-2008, 11:06 AM
Jon Jon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by B.F. View Post
I don't know about cpu.
Mine is enough.
Try to run game on XP and Vista (I had both) and it seems it more stable on XP with SM3 support.
Game is playable in most cases, but it had a few places were I had to lower my settings to play.
For me, 8800 GTX , Core 2

SM 3.0 1600 x 1200 = 25 - 30 fps . Looks awersome

SM 4.0 1600 X 1200 = 15 fps Look a bit diferent , maybe is the colour and also the shadows are a bit diferent .

And two videos

50 mb , very nice

http://www.mediafire.com/?d4mdynmzzia


20 mb

http://www.mediafire.com/?t3omttytyyz

screens















Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-06-2008, 11:10 AM
BAXTER STOCKMAN BAXTER STOCKMAN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Greece
Posts: 443
Default

[QUOTE=Jon;61052]For me, 8800 GTX , Core 2

SM 3.0 1600 x 1200 = 25 - 30 fps . Looks awersome

SM 4.0 1600 X 1200 = 15 fps Look a bit diferent , maybe is the colour and also the shadows are a bit diferent .

And two videos

50 mb , very nice

http://www.mediafire.com/?d4mdynmzzia


20 mb

http://www.mediafire.com/?t3omttytyyz

screens

And what about me? How will it looks /work o n my pc. I have XP SP2 and my monitor dosent support any higher resolution than 1280x1024. Does it looks better on dx10 mode than dx 9? Are thsese shots from dx 9 mode?

okay i removed the screen?

Now do you think is my 8800 gt enough for max settings 1280X1024 or i will have to play it on lower settings?

Last edited by BAXTER STOCKMAN; 12-06-2008 at 11:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.