![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
One thing I like about 1946 is that some of the unusually aircraft are modelled. Look at the German jet like ME262 & variants, HS129, ME109Z, etc.
I would like more German bombers, but I would like to see an official release of the BV141.
__________________
AMD Phenom 9500 Quad Core 2.2Ghz, 8Gb Ram, Nvidia GeForce 9800GT 1Gb, Windows 7 (64 bit) Saitek Cyborg 3D Gold joystick, Saitek rudder pedals, Saitek throttle quadrant, Saitek trim wheel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
But, will the IL2 game engine accurately model the performance of an asymmetrical plane? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’d be glad to see some German trainers in Il 2 in the future, e.g. Bücker Bü 181 (actually existing as a mod), Arado Ar 96B or Siebel Si 204D(E).
Well, now back to the topic of this thread: it isn’t much important, how anybody of us perceives priorities or possibilities – Do 17 yes or no or anything like this. These are questions of personal taste and opinion. We’ll have a good chance to fly He 177 in approximately 2 years, if the effort of the SVK community is successful. In the same time we can try to found a project of cockpit for the Do 217K, perhaps in the same or similar way as the SVK does. From my point of view this is the most useful course of our next thinking. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Static aircraft would be easy to model, would be a great way to add eye candy/targets to missions, and could possibly eventually be upgraded to actual flying (or flyable) models if there is interest. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by hafu1939; 02-27-2013 at 08:54 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True on both points. But, having static models of aircraft might be a first step towards flying models, which is a step towards having flyable models.
|
![]() |
|
|