Game comparisons..

[Pfeil]

From the DCS side of things IL2 may seem simplistic because it's not a study sim, but it has the right features in the right places.

If you're looking for a procedural trainer to learn how to operate the real thing, DCS has the advantage.

If you're looking to actually fly into combat in WW2 theaters with a large variety of period correct aircraft, environments and vehicles, IL2 has all that.


Personally I start up DCS: A10 every once in a while to sit in the cockpit and fiddle with the switches, but usually I don't even bother plugging in my joystick.
For me, when it comes to actually flying, IL2 has my preference. Even over GA sims.

IL2 also has not just more terrain choices, but terrain choices full stop. Unless DCS finally got the Nevada map it was promised ages ago, the Russian/Georgian map is still the same one I flew in LOMAC.

If you're looking for a WW2 setting specifically, DCS has very little to offer in that department. As far as I know there is no flak, only SAMs and shilka-style AA.
The AI aircraft are also much more modern, so either you fly mustang vs mustang, or get shot down by guided missiles.
In general DCS is much more focused on BVR. IL2 is the polar opposite. The few missiles it has are anti shipping or TOW-style guidance. Actual air to air combat is done with guns.

I would also argue the P51 in DCS is closer to the Vietnam war than WW2 loadout and technology wise.


I do urge you to try both. Either sim has its qualities, but it all depends on what you're looking for.

One last thing to keep in mind is the rig you're using. IL2 may look outdated, but the eye-candy in DCS demands much more powerful hardware. If you can't run it at a steady framerate, you're not going to enjoy it.