![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Problems pilot faced IRL due to low quality engine (to avoid interference with production of standardized engines). Rudel also felt much safer in JU-87. Avoid version with 75mm, and try to come in low ,drop bombs, make several gun passes (fire early, unless targeting tanks) and leave.
Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 01-27-2013 at 06:22 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I didn't even try the one with 75 mm cannon
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I love the Hs129 but it is a quirky and underpowered aircraft... problems it suffered in real life.
From Wikipedia: Hs129B-2 Max. takeoff weight: 5,250 kg (11,574 lb) Powerplant: 2 × Gnome-Rhône 14M 4/5 14-cylinder radial engines, 522 kW (700 hp) each http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henschel_Hs_129 Compared to say an IL-2M3 Loaded weight: 6,160 kg (13,580 lb) Powerplant: 1 × Mikulin AM-38F liquid-cooled V-12, 1,285 kW (1,720 hp) The IL-2 is a later model cetainly and it does weigh a bit more but it has a 320hp advantage from one engine compared to two. The Gnome-Rhone's are very poor from a power standpoint. My suggestion is to fly the Hs129 very gingerly. It's a solid attack aircraft and can really kill tanks but it's slow in everything it does. The upside is it's very stable for gunnery as it has a good counter rotating propeller arrangement.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The performance of the Hs 129 and the Il-2 are pretty similar, at least down low. As IceFire has already pointed out, the Il-2 is in fact the bigger, more powerful aircraft of the two. It's also got superior low speed performance, due to a lower wing loading, and at sea level it's slightly faster. But the Hs 129 is as tough and well armoured.
If you fly the Hs 129 with a gunpod, you spoil the performance of the aircraft quite a bit. The gondola adds considerable drag and weight, if you go against tanks, it's well worth it, but you're indeed an easy target for any fighter around. As a flying machine, I'd rate the Hs 129 superior to contemporary Il-2's without gunpods, but inferior with gunpods. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK then, perhaps the poor impression is exacerbated by the fact that its engines cut out under negative G, which is the last thing you want when you're down low dodging Flak. S! to the brave guys who had to fly that thing in real combat.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I find the Hs-129 so much more enjoyable to fly than the IL-2 and a lot more stable at low speeds too.
Gunnery is a lot easier with the counter rotating propellers and rudder trim (not found on the IL2). And it has fire extinguishers which is usefull given the tendency of the gnome-rhones to catch fire at the slight bullet impact. And is so much more tough than the IL-2, it will get you home as long as you have 1 good engine. I fly it a lot online and get very good results even in dogfights (with the B-2 and as long as it's one on one). The trick is to climb to 700 or 1000m before the attack run and attack in slashing passes, getting alt after every pass. You can do 4 or 5 continous passes like this before running out of energy. With the 7.5cm cannon on the B-3 is best to shoot from afar, if you shoot at 200m or less the shells won't explode. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Definitely once you get the trick with the B-3 it's a blast (literally
Love it! Great fun with this aircraft!
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The first thing the Gamer thinks of is to MOD the aircraft so it flies to his tastes, maybe a Japanese Zero would be a nice flight model for all the planes? A real simmer though uses his brain, practices and thinks of a way to use what he is given to get the job done, just like the pilots had to in WWII. In flying the HS-129 online I came to very similar tactics to those WOZ discovered and found it to be a fabulous tool for destroying armor. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
A Hs-129 even with Bk 3.7 is a wonderful anti-tank plane... if there's no horrible turbulence at low altitudes! However, I think that a Bf-110 would be a better choice. Even with having to adjust rudder trim, it's so much more nimble plane than Hs-129. Of course, the 129 supposedly survives ground fire better than the 110... or does it?
As for tail gunners, even if they can't shoot down all the enemy fighters, they provide a second pair of eyes for any ground pounder. Quote:
Mods suck. |
![]() |
|
|