Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-17-2012, 02:11 PM
*Buzzsaw* *Buzzsaw* is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
That is wrong.

The higher you go, the less effective the cooling due to pressure and density reduction despite the cooler temperatures.

So while the temperature does get cooler IAW the lapse rate, the density is reduced so we end up with less molecules to transfer heat away from our engine.
I can't say I am an expert on this matter. I made the assumption there is enough flow with the higher speeds at altitude and the cooler temps to cool the aircraft faster. Ie. IAS at sea level and 6000 meters may read the same, but TAS is much higher at altitude, and therefore airflow is much higher.

Anyone else want to comment?

Last edited by *Buzzsaw*; 12-17-2012 at 02:17 PM.
  #2  
Old 12-18-2012, 12:49 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
IAS at sea level and 6000 meters may read the same, but TAS is much higher at altitude, and therefore airflow is much higher.
Airflow is not much higher because of True Airspeed.
__________________
  #3  
Old 12-18-2012, 01:43 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Indicated airspeed is what matters, if indicated is high enough then cooling will be sufficient.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #4  
Old 12-20-2012, 02:38 AM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
Indicated airspeed is what matters, if indicated is high enough then cooling will be sufficient.
Bingo!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #5  
Old 12-20-2012, 04:21 AM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
That is wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Bingo!
Nothing changes here, does it?

Oil temp. Whatever settings people tell you to fly at, fly at less, apart from airspeed. Whether it be RPM or boost. Most people in a game fly at max poss everything all the time. Total rubbish.

What is the oil temp at which your engine blows? Find out. Run your mouse over the oil temp gauge and wait for it. Try it at different rpms. Try it at different boost settings. Just fly. Offline until you find out. Then you'll know.

Everything is there for you to find this out for yourself. Go to it.

Edit: 97 degrees. If memory serves correctly........

Last edited by ATAG_Dutch; 12-20-2012 at 02:21 PM.
  #6  
Old 12-22-2012, 12:47 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
Indicated airspeed is what matters, if indicated is high enough then cooling will be sufficient.


Why don't you take the time to explain the relationship of Indicated airspeed, True airspeed, and altitude?

Then take some to explain the general behavior of a altitude effects on thrust production at constant power setting and indicated airspeed.

After you have done that, you can sum it all up as:

Quote:
Crumpp says:

The higher you go, the less effective the cooling due to pressure and density reduction despite the cooler temperatures.
__________________
  #7  
Old 12-22-2012, 09:06 AM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post


Why don't you take the time to explain the relationship of Indicated airspeed, True airspeed, and altitude?

Then take some to explain the general behavior of a altitude effects on thrust production at constant power setting and indicated airspeed.

After you have done that, you can sum it all up as:
OK then:

if you climb at constant airspeed then true airspeed increases with altitude, at constant indicated airspeed the 'mass' of air flowing through the cooling system remains constant with the added effect of reduced ambient temperatures.
penalties of high altitude on performance are not really a factor, bottom line is if you keep the same amount of air mollecules passing through the cooling system then you won't have problems cooling, I'm not entirely sure where crumpp gets the theory that maintaining constant indicated airspeeds is not possible but everyone else understands that a constant reading on the airspeed indicator means constant indicated airspeed and we also know how to achieve it.
To some extent engine temperatures will also fall off with the natural reduction of power with altitude also.


Oh and

Looking forward to the next installment from the Nonsensical Administration of Crumpp Aeronautics

p.s. I'll post you a picture of what high altitude shows on the Learjet PFD tonight as I have an empty sector back from Denmark tonight.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition

Last edited by bongodriver; 12-22-2012 at 09:19 AM.
  #8  
Old 12-22-2012, 06:46 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch View Post
Nothing changes here, does it?
Annoying, isn't it? I don't think this is the best subject to make generalisations, because temperature over altitude characteristics depend on aircraft, engine, engine settings, flying regime. So I suggest to find a different excuse for being rude to each other.
  #9  
Old 12-22-2012, 10:14 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
Annoying, isn't it? I don't think this is the best subject to make generalisations, because temperature over altitude characteristics depend on aircraft, engine, engine settings, flying regime. So I suggest to find a different excuse for being rude to each other.
I suggest that no-one argue with Crumpp because it is patently obvious that he is THE undisputed expert on everything.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.