![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hm. I've had a few disappointments online in FM-2 (ancient history now, it was in those times when I really knew what I was doing online
It is agile I agree on that but what's the point when opposition is more agile and they can only be outmatched thru sheer speed. I see that plane more enjoyable offline while online I would prefer to fly Hellcat and Corsair. In that order. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The Wildcat can be fun too. It's definitely not going to reach the performance levels of those fighters that replaced it (with good reason) but I am curious if the FM-2 is performing at the level that it should or if it's been shortchanged a bit? I wish it had HVAR's like they were equipped with. Would make for some better strike mission options.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Maybe the prop is different too, optimized for climb instead of speed? Or some other difference? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The FM-2 had some extra juice over the regular Wildcat and comments suggest that it was noticeably quicker in the climb and a better turner but the in-game version I notice very little. Not sure if the prop is different too. You might be right...optimized for climb. Or even something extra just to get it off the escort carrier decks?
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
For a first impression:
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/f4f/fm-2.html Manual states 2600 rpm / 50" low blower, 52" high blower for WEP. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...6169-level.jpg
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/f4f/f4f.html It looks like the FM-2 should be faster than the F4F-3 at 14000 ft. Last edited by MaxGunz; 11-20-2012 at 12:40 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|