![]() |
|
King`s Bounty: Warriors of the North Next game in the award-winning King’s Bounty series |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't seen much mocking, I've seen people expressing their distaste for the state in which the game was released. I don't expect a bug-free game, but I do expect it to have been QA tested and most of the glaring bugs fixed. There were so many hard-crash issues, uncompletable quests, etc, that it's hard to believe that there was much QA done at all.
As for there being another KB, that's going to be an economic issue, not a matter for what people said on a forum. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Every advertisement about WotN was that it is NEW game in series, and not expansion for previous releases. As far i can tell this is like red sands addon for Ap/Cw but theLegend edition - new islands like in red sands, some new units like red sands , couple new medals and spells. Nothing crucial in difference like theLegend / Armored princess , those 2 games deserved to be called first and second considering improvements and new contents in AP. CW was expansion for AP and later Red sands mod/addon for it, like WotN is for the Legend. And i never said WotN is KB2. KB-tL was first in series, KB-Ap was new game , KB-WotN sohuld be new game, but simply isnt in state it got released and with bunch of junk and bugs from previous games.
If there was some problem in tL/Ap/Cw, and files with those same problems got transferred to this game then that is proof enough this game wasnt tested, or checked for functionality before shipping to market. This tread was opened for posting questions for devs expecting reply of some sort. So far 3 months isnce opening tread not a single repay to players questions. So mocking isn`t OK, but complete ignoring players questions from devs is. And check posts #7 , #11 , #26 there are some specific questions about game, not just junk posting or mocking in any way. Still devs didnt see it worth to answer to any of this questions. In bugfixes tread there are bunch of things that are implamented in new patch, so if devs just w8 for players to post solutions and put them in patches, and not responding to players questions and problems, and didnt test game before release then wtf are they doing ? Team of professional programers (i hope they are) that release shoddy product as this deserve ridicule and mocking from community of customers they ignore. Last edited by Fatt_Shade; 11-18-2012 at 02:28 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I believe that definition of expansion in video games is that you need the base game to play it.
You can play WotN without owning any of previous titles in the series so I guess that makes it a new game. Also, they are not completely ignoring us. They have already released two bug fix patches and I'm sure there will be more. And they are also a low-budget team so it's possible they don't have resources for two-way communicating with players. Last edited by Totoro; 11-18-2012 at 02:27 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If you buy new car and with it come little book with suggestions how to fix problems that will happen, will you say that is good product ? And when you run into problems, you go to shop and there is no one to help you. Same thing here. You give your money for something and then realize it`s not working, crash/block and cause lots of problems. Do you suggest merchant that sold you that product should be praised if you fix your problems by communicating with other customers? Quote:
1c is leading software publisher for Russia and eastern Europe, i`m sure they could afford 2-3 test players to try tihs bug infested game before activating it on steam for purchase. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Usually if you buy a car and it's not functioning like promised, you get a refund. Personally I don't mind waiting for bug fixes. Quote:
Quote:
And you can usually tell a game's budget just by looking at its graphics. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And my claim was on testing game before releasing it, not specific on budget for graphic improvements. 2 days after release there was list at least 100 bugs in game from players. Yo cant tell me this couldnt be avoided, with simple beta test. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
@Fatt_Shade
You don't need to spend your time to fix bugs. Just do other things and they get fixed in the meantime. They could have spend more effort on bugs before releasing the game but then the release would have been postponed. I don't think there is much difference whether you buy the game few months earlier and wait few months for bugs to get fixed or whether you buy the game few months later and get a bugfree game. Actually, I think the option to release a game with bugs is better because then players who don't care about them, can play anyway and those who care, can wait for them to get fixed. It's also possible that they were aware that the game has many bugs but decided to release it anyway because players kept asking about the release. Quote:
Last edited by Totoro; 11-18-2012 at 03:46 PM. |
![]() |
|
|