Final Poll for CLOD?

[GOA_Potenz]

I made a quick review of this poll and we just get out of the vote now a rate of

6.5 out of 10

So in the end this an average product from what we were promised from devs as the ultimate Flight Sim, a product of that quality should reach a 9-9.5 out of 10 with no problems.

Just 1 point gained since last costumers review.

[Flanker35M]

S!

Voted 6. Too long development compared to the outcome. Dev team broke things that did work in IL-2 instead of just refining them, like comms etc. I REALLY hope they've learned their lesson for sequel to make it a success.

[furbs]

Originally Posted by GOA_Potenz

I made a quick review of this poll and we just get out of the vote now a rate of

6.5 out of 10

So in the end this an average product from what we were promised from devs as the ultimate Flight Sim, a product of that quality should reach a 9-9.5 out of 10 with no problems.

Just 1 point gained since last costumers review.

I think 6.5 is a fair score, all we can hope for now is they have learned the lessons from the last few years and apply them to the sequel.

One of the main lessons is to have some sort of COOP system that uses all the bells and whistles of the new FMB, with the simple ease of use of the old system.

[fruitbat]

Originally Posted by furbs

I think 6.5 is a fair score, all we can hope for now is they have learned from the last few years and apply it to the sequel.

One of the main lessons is to have some sort of COOP system that uses all the bells and whistles of the new FMB, with the simple ease of use of the old system.

agreed 100%

At least it is a fun game now though.

[MadTommy]

Only play online.. 7 from me.

It would get 9 if the online population was bigger & if the code could cope with 100+ player servers.

[Insuber]

I gave a 7 only because of the total lack of competitors in this segment, apart from a 12 years old game called Il2 ...

But ...

Fulfilment of the expectations: 4
Respect of schedule: 0
FM of planes: 2 (think only to the 6500 m of plafond for 109, the near impossibility to do hammerheads, the lack of dynamic stall ...)
Online playability: 6
Squad online playability: 3
DM of planes: 4 (after the last patch, it was 6 before)
GUI: 4
Game manuals and reference: 1
FMB: 3 (you need a master in computer science to build a mission)
Community support and dedication: 9 (think only to the bugtracker created by users ...)

... and today I am in a good mood ...

[r0bc]

Wow 7 maybe but Luther wouldn't even give this a 8 - 9 or 10.

[Chivas]

Its been a rough ride, but if the announcement doesn't totally change the direction of the development, the Channel Map will only get better. The devs and community will be adding new content, improving features, adding features, new aircraft, and new theaters for years.

Even if the announcement includes an MMO, it doesn't necessarily mean the demise of the existing development. With work the game engine should be more than capable of doing both. The developer supplies the game engine, most of the aircraft and theaters, FMB's, SDK's, and the talented among us could build the missions, campaigns, etc.

[Plt Off JRB Meaker]

8 from me,I was really impressed at what had been fixed at the last update,the F/M's especially,no more grass in the hangars,no more weird colours in the cockpits,the clouds are back,the shadows look great,yeah it's starting to look good...........finally