Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Your score for the final version.
1 8 2.66%
2 2 0.66%
3 12 3.99%
4 21 6.98%
5 36 11.96%
6 46 15.28%
7 77 25.58%
8 77 25.58%
9 15 4.98%
10 7 2.33%
Voters: 301. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2012, 02:57 PM
ChocsAway ChocsAway is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 85
Default

4 out of 10 as an offline player.

Lower than that though without the contributions of Heinkill and Desastersoft re content.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2012, 03:18 PM
tintifaxl tintifaxl is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 387
Default

Same here 4/10. Even with the Desastersoft campaigns. Too many bugs affecting offline and coop play. For me that's not enough to continue flying CloD.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2012, 03:22 PM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tintifaxl View Post
Same here 4/10. Even with the Desastersoft campaigns. Too many bugs affecting offline and coop play. For me that's not enough to continue flying CloD.
Agreed.
4/10 for me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2012, 03:29 PM
Jugdriver's Avatar
Jugdriver Jugdriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 150
Default

7 out of 10 from me. Still having a blast online but there are just a few to many important omissions to make it rank higher IMO.

JD
AKA_MattE
__________________
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.4ghz
ZALMAN 120mm CPU Cooler
Intel X25-M 160GB SSD
Mushkin Enhanced Redline 8GB
MSI R7970 OC
ATI Catalyst 12.3
KINGWIN Mach 1 1000W
COOLER MASTER HAF 932

MajorBoris
"Question: Do you forum more than you fly?"

raaaid
"i love it here makes me look normal"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-23-2012, 03:40 PM
planespotter planespotter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 446
Default

3. From me sorry but I cant help compare what was got with what they promised an I hoped for.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-23-2012, 10:26 PM
icarus icarus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 323
Default

I gave it a 6 because the graphics are still unfinished and the SP play is so bad.

Not sure how anyone could vote 10 or 1 for that matter. Sarcasm votes I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-23-2012, 10:46 PM
foxl foxl is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 36
Default

I gave it 5.

The lack of clouds ruins the game for me, they only appear close to you aircraft and they are the same as in old IL-2 just small puffs of cotton. Without clouds and some weather effect there is no flight sim experience.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-23-2012, 11:07 PM
NedLynch NedLynch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 390
Default

5 for me.

single player here

-no dcg
-radio commands


That's it, I never really felt that all the fixes were so incredibly necessary.
Performance wise the game always ran just fine for me, I liked the graphics mostly, FM/DM were ok.
Yes a lot of things needed improving and improvements were made to great effect, I will not deny the devs my respect for their dedication.
But my biggest gripe has always been the lack of single player content, especially a dynamic campaign, so people can actually fly and have unrepetitive fun, despite all the other things that needed fixing.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-25-2012, 01:25 AM
SharpeXB's Avatar
SharpeXB SharpeXB is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 136
Default

After experiencing DCS: P-51D I give the IL-2 flight and aircraft models a 4. They just feel game-like in comparison. The bar has been raised.
The GUI and commands/ menu system in CloD get a 2. It's like they were designed by someone who has never seen a flight sim. There are basic commands missing and absurdly illogical ones like the zoom feature that uses the mouse and button combo.
The game graphics get an 8 or 9 and the level of detail on the ground is astonishing. There's still a funny color palette and lack of weather. But the map is the best part of the sim. Also I give a 10 to how well it runs after the patch. For how well it looks it runs so smooth it's fantastic.
The mission design included with the game gets a 5. All air starts or ground starts with the engine running is so arcade.
Desastersoft I must try and it might be the whole redeeming feature.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-26-2012, 08:46 AM
Ploughman Ploughman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ceinws Escairgeiliog, Cymru
Posts: 334
Default

6/10 for me. Playing off line there's very little content, it's a bit of a desert to be fair, on the other hand I recognise that CloD's got a lot of depth at its core and is quite enjoyable just as a aircraft study sim. Nice.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.