Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-25-2012, 10:42 PM
1984 1984 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 152
Default

1. yak-9m with vk-105pf2 engine...

...

2. more historically correct weapon for yak-9ut (now shfk-37 or something like this?), because -

Quote:
При стрельбе Як-9УТ вел себя более устойчиво во всем диапазоне скоростей и при всех эволюциях, чем Як-9Т и Як-9К, за счет уменьшения силы отдачи пушки Н-37 по сравнению с НС-37, а также расширения диапазона скоростей. При длине очереди из Н-37 в 4-5 выстрелов прицеливание практически не сбивалось, что обеспечивало увеличение меткости огня.

3. and, maybe? prototype of not serial yak-9p, just need change UBS to Shvak...

Quote:
Як-9П (пушечный) с двигателем М-105ПФ являлся модификацией серийного Як-9, на котором синхронный пулемет УБС с боезапасом 200 патронов был заменен на синхронную пушку ШВАК (СП-20) с боезапасом 175 снарядов.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2012, 03:32 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1984 View Post
2. more historically correct weapon for yak-9ut (now shfk-37 or something like this?), because -
This was corrected in a past patch thanks to some research by myself and several others.

Correct loadouts should be the NS-23 hub firing and two synchronized B-20S 20mm cannons in the upper decking. Alternatively the NS-37mm can be fitted along with the B-20S cannons. These changes were made thanks to Russian translated documents and a lot of digging.

Previously it was incorrect with an unused Sh37ki 37mm that was never fitted to the Yak-9UT (to my knowledge) and ShVAK 20mm in the decking. Also the flight model was altered slightly to reflect the pilots notes on the nose being noticeably heavier and slightly affecting handling. I still think it flies beautifully.

Quote:
and, maybe? prototype of not serial yak-9p, just need change UBS to Shvak...
Not all that different from the Yak-9UT. Aside from being all metal if memory serves, the notes I have state that the initial armament was the same as the Yak-9U (2xUBS and 1xShVAK) and was later changed to 3xB-20 (B-20M in the hub, B-20S in the decking) post war. I believe the N-37 and N-45 were also fitted but I'm not sure.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2012, 03:45 PM
Artist's Avatar
Artist Artist is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
Default Radiators accessible through DeviceLink

Hi Team Daidalos,

yesterday I (author of YaDeLi - support for more than 4 usb game controllers in IL-2) received a request concerning support for the radiators. Thankfully you introduced axis control for radiators in 4.10. Unfortunately this is not accessible via DeviceLink, so I cannot make them acessible via YaDeLi.

Would you be so kind?

Artist
__________________
Ceterum censeo the mixture axis should be supported in IL-2 1946' DeviceLink.

-------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-26-2012, 04:27 PM
[URU]BlackFox [URU]BlackFox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
Default

I don't remember if it's already been mentioned, but I'd like to suggest this:
  • Ground and Sea AI able to do some kind of "dodging" when enemy air units are around (maybe not ground AAA units, and not necessarily intelligent evasive manouvers, but taking the same heading as a torpedo plane approaching or some kind of zigzag when a dive bomber approaches)
  • Ships AI should identify other ships so they don't collide
  • Ship groups, something like ground columns. Example: Small convoy, Medium Convoy, Large Convoy, Carrier Group, etc.

I know it's a hell of a modification to ask, but it would be awesome to have these modelled.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-26-2012, 04:36 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Currently ships have no AI at all. They simply follow mission builder given way points.

What you are asking would be a huge task, as all the different types of ships would require their own discreet AI. Not to mention the load it would place on CPUs.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-26-2012, 05:13 PM
[URU]BlackFox [URU]BlackFox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
Default

I know, but maybe it can be scheduled to be analyzed for... v4.15?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-26-2012, 05:35 PM
Lagarto Lagarto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 236
Default

Given the choice, I'd rather have more variety of surface ships than have them more artificially intelligent.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-26-2012, 08:59 PM
Bearcat Bearcat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Va. by way of Da Bronx
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
Currently ships have no AI at all. They simply follow mission builder given way points.

What you are asking would be a huge task, as all the different types of ships would require their own discreet AI. Not to mention the load it would place on CPUs.
A possible workaround to that could be to try to time a mission so that when the strike group arrives the AI ships will begin a zig zag course.. I have seen this in coops before..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-26-2012, 09:00 PM
Luno13 Luno13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 370
Default

And it's a pain to get it to work out properly.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-26-2012, 11:28 PM
1984 1984 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
Alternatively the NS-37mm can be fitted along with the B-20S cannons.
of course, thx for ns-23...

but another load, it's was NOT ns-37, it's was n-37 - principal difference, and if DT really wants give to us prototype of yak-9ut with n-37 + 2 b-20, it's need to do correctly...

differences of cannons look here...

maybe, b-20m and n-45 can be as "what if" too...

Quote:
Also the flight model was altered slightly to reflect the pilots notes on the nose being noticeably heavier and slightly affecting handling. I still think it flies beautifully.
good... did not know...

Quote:
Not all that different from the Yak-9UT. Aside from being all metal if memory serves, the notes I have state that the initial armament was the same as the Yak-9U (2xUBS and 1xShVAK) and was later changed to 3xB-20 (B-20M in the hub, B-20S in the decking) post war. I believe the N-37 and N-45 were also fitted but I'm not sure.
you not understood, i talk about yak-9 with VK-105PF... maybe it's my fault, sorry...

all principal changes for yak-9p with VK-105PF it's second shvak instead UBS...

if it's not hard, i think, DT can give this load for yak-9 1942 for us, or how another airplane... easy "what if"... i all time wanted try this, but NO any mods...

plus, of course, were many similar not serial yaks, but maybe this is too...

and how this plane can be use in game or online? in serious online (wars i mean) it's CAN be use, trust me ("front tests", prize etc)... like i-185 now...

Last edited by 1984; 09-26-2012 at 11:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.