![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting post from a "Spitfire pilot's" perspective. I flew a short time offline in an E4 a couple of days ago, but mainly as a "systems' check" to verify my HOTAS controls operated correctly in this fine machine. I didn't do any formal testing at all, but just to get "a feel" for it.
My initial impression: this is enough to drag me kicking and screaming over to the Dark Side! LOL. Seriously, it had a "good feel" to it (and I say this after flying the various Spit and Hurricane marks exclusively online). As you say, visibility was excellent which surprised me. No birdcage effect at all and no annoying horizontal canopy bar at eye level as in the Hurricane. Speed and climb was wonderful, workload virtually non-existent once your controls were set. Didn't have to constantly keep one eye on the temp gauges and risk losing SA. The eye-opener: bunting into a steep dive at 6000 meters where my view temporarily went red from neg -g but the engine kept purring, then quickly reaching 710 kmh IAS in the dive......AND PULLING OUT!!!! That's 447 mph IAS and I still had all ailerons, elevator, and rudder still attached! The only thing missing? The smoking hole in the ground if I had tried that in a Spitfire. I didn't try any stalls or spins. I did find the prop pitch a little slow (in manual) to change from fine to coarse and back again compared to the Spit (I have prop pitch in the Spits assigned to an axis on my HOTAS, the E4 had pitch control assigned to a joystick hat). The auto pitch was a joy for just casual aerobatics, not sure if I would use it in a close-run dogfight. My overall impression: the devs, from my perspective, have done a fine job on this model. Even the cockpit animations work! ![]()
__________________
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting read from a 'red only' perspective.
Personally I can not understand why anyone would not fly all the aircraft in the game, it's interesting and you pay for them. The only reason I fly mainly red at the moment is because of the challenge with the gaps so far apart in current patch. That gets you concentrating really hard. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I totally agree!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i don't. I'm totally all right with flying my favorite bf 110 only. that's i've bought this game. i dont interested in flying any other planes.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yes the 110 is one of the most interesting plane to fly in CoD. I do agree.
Sadly it's too easy to fly. Devs have a lot of tweaking to make it less perfect ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I don't usually fly red but I can assure you that once my 10 seconds worth of cannon ammo have been expended (uselessly in most cases) I'd very happily swap my twin MG 17s for your eight Brownings any day of the week! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Whoever said in this thread that the armament was an advantage on LW side was right - nose mounted mgs + cannons = hell of a punch. Good shot will be succesful with anything, but I admit the MG17 are a great weapon when used right, as a RAF pilot I fear not the Oerlikon cannons, but long range MG 17.
__________________
Bobika. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then try the stuka. This plane is so arcadish in this game it's a shame!
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I don't know a lot about the stuka in real life to be able to compare it to the COD one, it is enjoyable to fly though.
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
![]() |
|
|