![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well my ROF looks better than that pic try to use the Anti-Aliasing settings it will get rid of the jaggies.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think they both look great.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes they do.
And the rof pic was a random one from the web
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks like a fairly early version with low landscape settings. It looks significantly different now, but still needs some clod style bumps maps to give a better feeling of depth.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
About CoD and the weather-landscape problem, we can only hope in the sequel and yes.....in the RoF Channel. The CoD's Channel with those textures and without weather is no more no less than nothing. Terrible if not horrible. Last edited by 150GCT_Veltro; 09-06-2012 at 04:17 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
stop compare ROF and CLOD.
it is two different sim. not the same era. personally i find that ROF is not better than CLOD but i don't care about WW1 sim... then i don't care ROF. please people here...speak about same sims to compare... take il2, CLOD, BOB. but not ROF. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, regarding that ROF screenshot, it definately doesn't represent highest quality settings. Looks like it's even set to low landscape (which you definately don't need to set, if you can run CloD...).
However, the terrain in ROF looks more generic and very flat at longer distances. Especially at the horizon it looks a little off. Worst thing however, are the trenches, roads, railroads etc. They just look sticked on top of the normal landscape (which they practically are) and make the engine look older than it is. I prefer the CloD landscape, because it seems more unique and less generic, but it's still far from perfect. The colors still look funny and i could live with a bit less bump mapping. Also while the water looks very well from high altitude, it seriously suffers when you fly low. I think ROF has the edge (only at low altitude though), even without the new 3d water of the coming update. As for the future looking bright etc., i don't think that's true for either ROF or CloD... |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() By furbs9999 at 2011-07-31 ![]() By furbs9999 at 2011-07-31 And not a landscape, but something else missing from CLOD... ![]() By furbs9999 at 2011-07-31
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Last edited by furbs; 09-06-2012 at 07:39 PM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beautiful SE5a pic it looks so crisp.
|
![]() |
|
|