|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
07-19-2008, 06:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Very slightly, if at all.
The photograph should be reviewed with care, though: 1. There is no seat in this FW190D13 as you can see from the other pictures taken, so the photograph is guessing the point of view of the pilot inflight. 2. There is no engine and no nose attached, so the photographer is also guessing on the angle of view. 3. If this photograph was taken to model the view in a FW190, the overall visibility should be largely decreased compared to this:  IMHO there are much better pictures from inside complete FW190s present. 
|
|
#2
07-19-2008, 08:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
to late for IL2 Sturmovik!
but see this pictures:      here a video from the FW190A4 Cockpit:
|
|
#3
07-20-2008, 08:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#4
07-20-2008, 10:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here we go again!
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
|
|
#6
07-21-2008, 03:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
How the revi works ... I thought it was a collimated display therefore reticle size would not vary as distance from the combining glass changes. That is a basic reason for the the reflector gunsights very existence. You will with most reflector sights have view angle limitations but reticle size should not vary with eye to glass distance.
There is something not quite right with this video. I suspect the optics in this sight are not original.
|
|
#7
07-21-2008, 07:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I noticed that, too. Especially with the building in the background you can see the gunsight changes size pretty much when moving back and forth. I doubt it was like that in the real thing or guessing distances really was pure guessing.
|
|
#8
07-22-2008, 02:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Depending how accurate the drawing is, did anyone notice the size of the 'bar'?
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
