Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2012, 02:30 PM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

A Spitfire XIV or XVIe?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2012, 09:09 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighterace View Post
A Spitfire XIV or XVIe?
If the XIV model is to be done full justice then it would be:

F.XIVc
F.XIVc Clipped
F.XIVe
F.XIVe Clipped
F.XIVe Bubble Canopy
F.XIVe Bubble Canopy and Clipped

I think there were some power changes involved there too so perhaps the bubble canopy one would be more representative of a March/April 1945 machine while the XIVc would be the mid 1944 and the XIVe would be late 1944. Without introducing ridiculous numbers of variants.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:11 AM
Ace1staller Ace1staller is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: somewhere in the united states
Posts: 125
Default

More French Aircraft anyway including we lack French bombers. Also I would like to see Early 109s and other aircraft involved in the spanish civil war
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-01-2012, 08:08 AM
dFrog dFrog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
If the XIV model is to be done full justice then it would be:

F.XIVc
F.XIVc Clipped
F.XIVe
F.XIVe Clipped
F.XIVe Bubble Canopy
F.XIVe Bubble Canopy and Clipped

I think there were some power changes involved there too so perhaps the bubble canopy one would be more representative of a March/April 1945 machine while the XIVc would be the mid 1944 and the XIVe would be late 1944. Without introducing ridiculous numbers of variants.
+ gyrogunsight added to all Spitfires from mid 1944. It is shame that only P-51D-20NA has it while brits were the first who used it. Here in Mk.IX :

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:14 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dFrog View Post
+ gyrogunsight added to all Spitfires from mid 1944. It is shame that only P-51D-20NA has it while brits were the first who used it. Here in Mk.IX :

Yes that's another nice thing to have. I was wondering about a Mark XVI with gyro gunsight and rocket rails. Otherwise, same performance and appearance to a +16lb LF.IX although there were some reports that the Merlin 266 was, in practice, not quite as capable as the Merlin 66.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:38 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

While were thinking about aircraft... more Beaufighter variants would be fun to have. We already have a solid base with the Australian Mark 21. A Mark X maybe? I guess the radar install would be difficult.

Or a Mosquito bomber. Pretty widely used aircraft in both cases that would be useful in a variety of settings and scenarios.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com

Last edited by IceFire; 09-01-2012 at 02:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:47 PM
Lagarto Lagarto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 236
Default

Hurricane Mk IID; we also have a solid base already
Not to mention B-25C/D/J solid-nosed strafer. Or a Ju 88C-6...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-01-2012, 06:57 PM
K_Freddie K_Freddie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 563
Default

How's another funny..
When the AI goes in for the kill, how about letting them just go straight in and shoot, instead of doing all these fancy aerobatics behind the target and generally letting it get away

It's as if the AI want to play with it's food. Sitting there as wingman I watch this in disbelief.. eventually losing my cool and pushing the rest of the flight out of the way and plastering the target to tiny pieces.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.