![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Increase TU RESULTING IN a realistic and historical TU value in particular above 17'000 ft and up to 30'000 ft Increase VW RESULTING IN an accurate (and sustainable !) VW value that does'nt harm the engine after just 5 minutes (sik) Increase XY RESULTING IN an historical and realistic XY value, obviously Quote:
PS for your information, 109E and Spit Mk I are a match unlike the current state. I feel a turtle in the Sky, did'nt you notice the 109 dancing over British aircrafts ? If you have a good and generally easy experience in a 109 versus Hurri and Spit, I do not doubt your qualities, but expect there are some other reasons underlying Last edited by jf1981; 08-10-2012 at 12:00 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The poor Ju-88 needs to brought up to spec. It is roughly 40-50kmh slow maybe more, which is also causing issues with the R-22 not being able to hold altitude
At 2250m (peak pre supercharger performance) with ata 1.2 and rpms 2400 on orange and trimmed for level flight @ 11,000 kg weight. I am only able to get 310 IAS which equates to 353 TAS @2250m. (Yes you can get on the step for a slight increase.) All data available says the A-4 with Jumo 211J engines was slower than the A-1 with 211B engines due to extra armor and load capability and bulge and the following charts claim A-4 data. This performance graph corresponds to a Ju88 A-4, which was test flown without charge air cooler. The first two lines were flown at a gross weight of 13750 kg. The extended kg with a total weight 11500 ![]() From http://www.ju88.equitatura.de/performance.htm And these specs are also based on the A-4 5. Cruise Enriching lever is in position "Normal". a) Cruising speeds when mixture control is in position "Lean" ("Arm") and enriching lever in position "Normal": Altitude V-w Supercharger P2((ATA) n (RPM) 300 350 low gear 1.15 2250 2000 390 low gear 1.15 2250 4000 400 high gear 1.15 2250 6000 400 high gear 1.10 - 1.15 2250 b) Maximum speeds when mixture control is in position "Rich" ("Reich") and enriching lever in position "Normal": Altitude V-w Supercharger P2((ATA) n (RPM) 300 375 low gear 1.25 2400 2000 410 low gear 1.25 2400 4000 415 high gear 1.25 2400 6000 425 high gear 1.15 - 1.25 2400 I have also voted on bugtracker for the known bugs, but the 2 that would be nice to fix soon since making the Ju-88 more useable would be the Bomb bay door Toggle working and not auto shutting or auto opening the bomb bay along with adding the Automatic VS Prop feature. Working fuel levers for fuel transfers would also be nice even if its a toggle with no animations. Thank you.
__________________
i7 2600K - Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 - EVGA GTX 570 HD 2560MB - Corsair Vengeance 8GB DDR3 1600 - Rosewill Bronze Series 1000W 80Plus - Crucial M4 128GB SATA III (clod) - Asus VS248H-P 24" - WD Black 1TB @ 6gbps CH Fighterstick-CH Pro Pedals-Saitek Throttle-Track IR5 - (CH Yoke for Bombers) “The end of democracy and the defeat of the American Revolution will occur when government falls into the hands of lending institutions and moneyed incorporations.” ¯ Thomas Jefferson Last edited by Chromius; 08-09-2012 at 09:12 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
+1
In RL the Interceptors had to be in a good position to catch a fleeing bomber, it was usually a longer pursuit and the hope that no fighter cover appeared. That's what made Radar so important.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|