Stability and Control characteristics of the Early Mark Spitfires

[taildraggernut]

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

I don't consider asking the developers to model accurate handling characteristics to be a castration.

Accurate by whose standards? Ok let's see how it goes when Crumpp starts the apparent topic on the 109.

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by taildraggernut

Accurate by whose standards?

Well, according to the docs that Lane posted, the A&AEE's standards.

Ok let's see how it goes when Crumpp starts the apparent topic on the 109.

I'll be just as active in that thread as I am in this one. See you there.

[taildraggernut]

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

If you don't want other people jumping in, then take it to PM. This is a public forum, not a dueling arena.

I furthermore don't think that wanting to stay on topic is "starting a riot". This thread is cluttered enough as is, and I hope the moderators come and remove some of the clutter.

Ah pseodo-righteousness, yes it's a public forum, I asked Crumpp some questions on his claims, I see no need to go to PM for that.

I have asked nothing of Crumpp that is off topic, I merely want some answers to questions on his topic, so please kindly reffrain from speaking to me and I won't bother you, yes I have a feeling the Mods will be getting plenty of requests for clean ups and complaints about users, it seems to be the MO with Crumpps thugs.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by taildraggernut

Ok let's see how it goes when Crumpp starts the apparent topic on the 109.

Goodluck!

I highly recomend you don't hold your breath waiting on that one!

[taildraggernut]

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

Well, according to the docs that Lane posted, the A&AEE's standards.

Would you mind pointing out where those standards show clearly how dangerous and what a 'death trap' the Spitfire allegedly is?

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

I'll be just as active in that thread as I am in this one. See you there.

I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever

[Al Schlageter]

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

I don't consider asking the developers to model accurate handling characteristics to be a castration.

Have you forgotten all the 100 octane threads?

[Al Schlageter]

Originally Posted by taildraggernut

I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever

It will be from the other side of the fence tho.

[taildraggernut]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Goodluck!

I highly recomend you don't hold your breath waiting on that one!

But it has been promised, this one has been done to death, Spitfire debates are getting boring, I wan't to get into the guts of the 109 anyway...it's everyones favourite.

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by Al Schlageter

Have you forgotten all the 100 octane threads?

No I haven't. Those threads were monumentally stupid from all perspectives.

There should be 87- and 100-octane aircraft in game. We have those now, so I feel the issue is moot and not worth discussing unless it's to correct the performance. But words cannot describe how much I just don't care if it was 100% or 0% of the RAF that was on 100 octane.

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by taildraggernut

Would you mind pointing out where those standards show clearly how dangerous and what a 'death trap' the Spitfire allegedly is?

I never said it was dangerous, or a death trap, and neither do the A&AEE's conclusions.