![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
did you check that thread I mentioned? the Breeze/thermal factor slider in mission parameters in the FMB changes the temparatures and set it to 0 you get pretty much standard conditions, with further experimentation I'd like to find out if there is a way to get ISA - conditions.
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I did, yes.
What I meant was that, perhaps the slider in FMB allows us to change the pressure in the relative sense. I.e. The difference between 0 and 10 on that slider might not produce ~ISA and ISA+10 on a different map, which is what I meant by "map-wise setting" It will be nice in a couple of years to if/when we get some FMB documentation. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
We know the lapse rate is 1.98C/1000ft, right?
Set the altimeter to field elevation and read the window to get pressure. It is close enough. Have someone spawn with an aircraft that has an OAT gauge and read the temp at that field elevation. You have the data required to convert the performance for that map.
__________________
Last edited by Crumpp; 06-29-2012 at 07:27 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Note the weight of the plane @ take off and not "maximum take off weight" as per the POH.
__________________
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Then you know for sure.
__________________
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
On a different map, it might not, which is what I was saying needs to be tested when we get another map. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|