Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-21-2012, 12:20 PM
Aer9o Aer9o is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
1) DX9 is in the system requirements, we have to support it.
2) DX9 is very important for our next project, we want to make it a popular game, what will work on maximum variants of PC. Now we are fixing and testing DX9 on CloD engine.
3) The sample of votes from the forum is not representative
Thank you for your reply... however I find it quite extrodinary that you think the "sample of votes are not relevant". If you have to fix DirectX 9 so be it but you should not delay the patch by doing so. In some previos update you where talking about a few days for optimising the clouds, another few for the grass etc... this has not materialised, isn`t it ?
  #2  
Old 06-21-2012, 12:47 PM
BlackSix BlackSix is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aer9o View Post
Thank you for your reply... however I find it quite extrodinary that you think the "sample of votes are not relevant". If you have to fix DirectX 9 so be it but you should not delay the patch by doing so. In some previos update you where talking about a few days for optimising the clouds, another few for the grass etc... this has not materialised, isn`t it ?
It will be a beta patch again as I know. And it's our choise what we want to test at present. All, what was promised, will be in the final patch.
  #3  
Old 06-21-2012, 04:30 PM
Catseye's Avatar
Catseye Catseye is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aer9o View Post
Thank you for your reply... however I find it quite extrodinary that you think the "sample of votes are not relevant". . . . . snip ?
He DID NOT say "not relevant" -

He said, "not representative " - a VERY big difference.

He is correct, your wording of the poll and sampling group do not represent the greater market. Your sampling and wording is not congruent with sampling techniques.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.