could relativity proof have been falsified?

[raaaid]

i already answered cause they are cherry picked words

your ignoring the fact that i provided a high level link claiming refraction light bending WASNT TAKEN INOT ACCOUNT till the 90s, what means eisntein didnt acount for what means einstein is a farce as the stablishment truths

culombs or montomon laws im not sure any more what to wrtie when asked in physics exam about friction

according in the non affected by tt



and ill translate:

the force strictly necesary to make that a body slides over other is INDEPENDENT of the area of contact and its proportional to the normal reaction

edit:

oh and the true fundamental law of physics its in that link on starlight bending:

nature does as it pleases

edit:

http://www.tribology-abc.com/abc/history.htm

do you realize how history MAY have been rewritten?

even outlaw says friction is DPENDANT on surface

of course its counterintuitive, as counterituivtive as all false things

oh but no way can we both outlaw and me be samrter than those HISTORIC genious who are conspiring and reading this at this very same moment 500 years ago

edit:

hey "they" could tt and eliminate races

if there are no races people will believe friction is NOT dependant of surfaces

those huge tyres may make those who are not conspiring believe galileleo montamas and cuolombs were just crooks

edit:

otlaw your a smart guy try this one:

what happens if you have a double ramp like this ^ in which two identical weights are united through a pulley by an string

the coeficient of friction of the left is 0.1 while in the right 0.9, both weights produce a tangential force to the ramp bigger than friction for being very heavy