![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
You know how you can tell when your getting under someones skin? See above!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
lol....I had fun writing that one Ace. I realize getting under peoples skin or getting them banned is what gets you excreting fluids from your body with joy, so I wouldn't want to take that away from you. Since you don't ever fly the game you illedgedly love so much, what else are you gonna do?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But tell me, what was it that I said that upset you so much? Was it me taking the wind out of your CoD development time sail? When I pointing out that most of that so called 8+ year CoD development time took place, in parallel, with 1C supporting (sequels, updates, patches) for IL-2. Translated means 1C was not devoting 100% of their efforts on CoD development, thus only a fool, or someone with a motive, or one of the hanful of devoted whinners of this forum would even try to sell such an idea Or was it something else I said?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You mis-stating timelines doesn't upset me Ace....everyone knows the deal. IL FB was released in early 2004 so that's close to 7 years of pretty much dedicated dev time to COD. 1946 was basically a compilation with some extras so it didn't interfere so much. Since it was all based on the original IL2 engine, it wouldn't have taken much from developing the COD engine. I will agree with you that COD wasn't a 100% developement effort even though they were able to dedicate a solid 6-7 years to it. Not even close.. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Il-2 1946 was released in december 2006, Clod developmente started in late 2005, i still remember the first photo of the clouds and the hurri cockpit 3D merged with the old date photo, so since Q4 2006 and ahead CloD was their only develpment work they did till march 2011 when it supouse to be finished and june 2012 when it is not close to be finished yet.
6+ years isn't early development Last edited by GOA_Potenz; 05-31-2012 at 02:44 AM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not sure how this affected development of CoD, but there was more than PF and 1946 developed between the releases of FB and CoD. There was EAP, PF, Sturmoviks Over Manchuria, Pe-2, and finally 1946. While 1946 was a conglomeration of all the previous releases, there was some new materials that took time to create and add to the game- the Lerche being a prime example..
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clod and IL2FB were developed totally different... also if you can find a copy of the original IL2 sturmovik before forgotten battles, and compare that to 1946 4.11.1... their totally different games... it took 12 years for the game to get to where it is now...and thats 12 years AFTER release...
now how long has clod been out? see u can't compare them. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I seem to be the only one who look forward to another modern version of Aces high. Thats a great game but i dont play it due to its bad graphics.
If we can have CLOD graphics (although im no ta big fan of the greenish colours during daytime in it) and a big multiplayer game with ground vehicles driven by real players and 100s and 100s of players at the same time , well then it sounds like fun to me! |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
i think everyone would like a game with everything like ww2 online, except with clod type graphics and physics... and perhaps more than just france.... and wouldn't really need to be a monthly fee, could just do it like world of tanks and have it just take a lot longer to get the next piece of equipment if you don't get a premium account...
however i don't think 15$ a month is a lot to play a game... it costs that for a movie ticket, and thats only 2 hours... |
![]() |
|
|