Now see what moding does for a game and company!

[sniperton]

Originally Posted by csThor

I think many modders would fight teeth and nails against any kind of "common development plan" as it would simply take away their total freedom to decide what they want to do [...] we're not just there to incorporate features modders would like to have

I know that human nature and the "mod mentality" cannot be changed. And I'm fine with TD not wishing to be "at the beck and call of the modding community". But as exactly as one of the people you described as TD's target audience, I find that some mod contents would be great to have also in the vanilla game, and all the more so as they are only exchanging old skins for better new skins, old textures for better new textures, and the like. There might be some technical limitations involved, as I hear, but, errr, I'm a bit sceptical about this so far as I see one and the same mission loading faster and running smoother in UP+DBW than in the vanilla game...

Originally Posted by csThor

[...] we do incorporate external developments if the makers get in touch with us, if their stuff meets the technical requirements and does not go against the content limitations we agreed to when signing the contract with 1C.

To sum it up, I would encourage TD to incorporate external developments not only on the initiative of the maker, but to approach all those whose "stuff meets the technical requirements and does not go against the content limitations we agreed to when signing the contract with 1C".

[JtD]

TD is actively approaching certain people with certain projects.

[Jones]

Originally Posted by JtD

TD is actively approaching certain people with certain projects.

Good!

I want TD to absolutely retain their position the as the "official" custodians of the IL-2 code base. They have done a fantastic job so far and have my full confidence that they will continue in the future. 100% trust can not be bought.

DO NOT under any circumstance cheapen the TD brand!

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by csThor

Why is a common ground mandatory? As it is there is no cohesion or overt cooperation between the various mod-groups beyond cross-incorporation of some individual mods. And, unless I'm getting senile, any kind of "unification movement" was dead within days of its announcement. Simply put: There is simply no will to unite the various mod groups within the modding scene itself, mostly because different people have different ideas about what to mod and how and of course because people prefer diversity, so there is little to no common ground in that area already. And then come the limitations TD has agreed to observe ... limitations most mod users would surely refuse to accept. Diversity, remember?

The division into a modding camp and a stock camp is a fact of 1946 which cannot be discussed away nor can it be overcome. That genie has been out of its bottle for so long that it simply refuses to go back in ...

I believe that TD has become that common ground.. and as they add more features of it will become more so.

Originally Posted by Jones

I want TD to absolutely retain their position the as the "official" custodians of the IL-2 code base. They have done a fantastic job so far and have my full confidence that they will continue in the future. 100% trust can not be bought.
DO NOT under any circumstance cheapen the TD brand!

Exactly how I feel. If a mod pack goes at odds with what the stock sim is doing I will not use it ...