Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-28-2012, 07:23 AM
bzc3lk bzc3lk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Yes RoF delivered

But the point I made..

And the point you missed!

Is it took RoF a year to deliver!

Hope that helps! S!
The point you made that Rof was delivered after one year was definitely not missed by myself or many other customers, but the point you either choose to or cannot see is after over one year of CLOD this game is not even in the shadow of ROF post twelve months for reliability or playability.

Hope that helps!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-28-2012, 07:49 AM
hiro hiro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 352
Default

thanks B6 for the update, appreciate them coming.




some level of awesomeness.





when its all ironed out, this game will be




that said, comparing the release of this game to the rise of flight is like comparing the development of the p-51 and the f-22, two different birds . . .

also it doesn't change anything. one can argue to wits end how much better ROF and its company to CLOD etc, or that ROF had a same jacked up release and took cabbage of patches to get to its fun state, but it won't change a thing where we are at with CLOD or the Moscow plan.

The truth of the matter is the game could be better, and the devs are working towards that.

That's it. Yeah it had a bad release, but its being worked on.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-28-2012, 08:01 AM
bzc3lk bzc3lk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hiro View Post
thanks B6 for the update, appreciate them coming.


that said, comparing the release of this game to the rise of flight is like comparing the development of the p-51 and the f-22, two different birds . . .


I couldn't agree more about the f22 comparison.



http://gizmodo.com/5897951/f+22-fail...e-have-no-clue
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-28-2012, 08:21 AM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

ohh ... RoF vs CLoD

What is next, Superman vs Batman ?

Keep going kids, its been very funny.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-28-2012, 08:56 AM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buchon View Post
ohh ... RoF vs CLoD

What is next, Superman vs Batman ?

Keep going kids, its been very funny.

Buchon is right.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-28-2012, 02:37 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bzc3lk View Post
The point you made that Rof was delivered after one year was definitely not missed by myself or many other customers,
Well than you would do well as to make mention of it from time to time as I did, in that your post convently left that fact out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bzc3lk View Post
but the point you either choose to or cannot see is after over one year of CLOD this game is not even in the shadow of ROF post twelve months for reliability or playability.
It is silly to think you can make a direct comparsion between the two.. For many reasons.. Just to name a few
  • RoF is a DX9 API game CoD is DX11 API game
  • RoF pay for updates gives them a more frequant cash flow, CoD only gets cash with sequals
Those two things make them very different

I presented the RoF example with regards to how long it took them to get it all worked out.. In that all games go through this process.. Some take a few weeks and some like RoF and now CoD can take over a year to sort things out.. Something you and yours convently want to ignore when talking about the state of CoD

Hope that helps!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-28-2012, 02:51 PM
Ace Cheese Ace Cheese is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 38
Default

I think it's closer to being sad than funny. Don't post pointless garble; I'm pretty sure they're are doing their job.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-28-2012, 02:59 PM
GOA_Potenz GOA_Potenz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Well than you would do well as to make mention of it from time to time as I did, in that your post convently left that fact out.


It is silly to think you can make a direct comparsion between the two.. For many reasons.. Just to name a few
  • RoF is a DX9 API game CoD is DX11 API game
  • RoF pay for updates gives them a more frequant cash flow, CoD only gets cash with sequals
Those two things make them very different

I presented the RoF example with regards to how long it took them to get it all worked out.. In that all games go through this process.. Some take a few weeks and some like RoF and now CoD can take over a year to sort things out.. Something you and yours convently want to ignore when talking about the state of CoD

Hope that helps!

DX11???????????? where??? we don't even have a decent DX10 support and devs are trying to build a DX9 version, that's what ya call DX11 game???

Oh gosh...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-28-2012, 03:16 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOA_Potenz View Post
DX11???????????? where??? we don't even have a decent DX10 support and devs are trying to build a DX9 version, that's what ya call DX11 game???

Oh gosh...
Once again your showing either your bias.. or ignorance

Not sure which, and really don't care, but the end result is the same.. You being wrong

Now, re-read what I wrote and note I said the DX11 API

note the API part following the DX11 part

Hope this helps!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-28-2012, 03:22 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

One cannot drive looking in the rear view mirror. Mistakes, trust, bugs, my 50 dollars blah blah blah ... enough has been written, and not a single step forward will be done by the team based on continuous and obsessive repetition of the well known story. Nothing new can be said, after 1 billion posts on the matter.

Let's carry on.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.