Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2012, 11:48 PM
badfinger badfinger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
I will state this shortly and simply.

Foo'bar was banned for apparent 'malicious intent' and when it was clear this wasn't present the reason given was that he caused damage to user's systems.

So damage was done (apparently).

We have moderators who use ignore lists, and thus don't moderate efficiently or effectively, and clearly lack the unbiased, separate nature a moderator is required to have.

Hence damage is done, and will continue to be done.

I struggle to see the difference, especially when one is clearly intentional.

Please not as well: there is no suggestion here that the moderators are inefficient (so no grounds to get me into trouble) but rather my realistic perception that such a lack of objectiveness and fairness will always reap poor results.

-Thank you.
Two thoughts:

1) Whatever his intent, it is the result that matters.

2) "I didn't know the gun was loaded" is not a viable defense.

He got what he deserved, even if he didn't think about the consequences of his actions.

It might have been a good joke, at some other time. But yesterday was not that time.

binky9
__________________
Win10 64 bit
1T Hard Drive
ASUS P67 motherboard
Intel i7 3.4ghz Processor
GTX 780 Graphics Card OC
24GB Ram
Track IR5
50" LG HDMI LED 1920x1080 60hrz
MS FFB2 Stick
CH Pedals
Saitek Throttle/Prop/Mixture and Trim wheel
Thrustmaster MFDs

League City, TX
  #2  
Old 04-28-2012, 11:55 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Foo'bar should be unbanned immediately, there is not a single poster on these forums that has done more for the game than he has if anyone has a right to moan about anything it's him he clearly spent a lot of time working on models for this game and from what I have seen he has had little to no respect from the users or 1C for all his efforts... such a shame.

P.S. I could name 100 users on this forum that have done more damage on these forums for "supporting" the devs than he has... a single unfortunate post and he is banned!!! Luthier, B6 you should intervene in this!
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.

Last edited by JG52Krupi; 04-29-2012 at 12:00 AM.
  #3  
Old 04-29-2012, 01:41 AM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
Foo'bar should be unbanned immediately, there is not a single poster on these forums that has done more for the game than he has if anyone has a right to moan about anything it's him he clearly spent a lot of time working on models for this game and from what I have seen he has had little to no respect from the users or 1C for all his efforts... such a shame.

P.S. I could name 100 users on this forum that have done more damage on these forums for "supporting" the devs than he has... a single unfortunate post and he is banned!!! Luthier, B6 you should intervene in this!
So it's cool to be an ass if we contribute to the sim? Sweet, I'll go fire up 3DS Max so I have carte blanche to be a jerk on the forums.

Oh wait.... nope, sorry, contributing 3d models does not render a person above the law.
  #4  
Old 04-28-2012, 11:58 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

He definitely didn't deserve the ban.

People have to be responsible for their actions, he didn't do anything wrong, it's the act first-think later crowd which got what they deserved.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
  #5  
Old 04-29-2012, 12:04 AM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
He definitely didn't deserve the ban.

People have to be responsible for their actions, he didn't do anything wrong, it's the act first-think later crowd which got what they deserved.
+1
True.
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
  #6  
Old 04-29-2012, 12:26 AM
Stublerone Stublerone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 250
Default

I am really sorry, but if I see guys downloading without looking, than it is their fault. As I read the post yesterday, I directly saw, that is 1 year old.

I cannot understand such guys now whining, that there was serious damage as result. Again sorry, but do you never open your eyes before downloading and installing? Ooooooomg

And the best: Most of the pilots here do not any guy of the community and do not know, what foo bar already made for us all. That is the next fault by some gamers here. I just see very much guys, who are not aware to the game, the history and the community.

Otherwise, nobody would ever say yes for a ban of foobar!!!! He simply do not deserve it and he became a not unimportant part of the product "IL2".

So you should reject this ban.
  #7  
Old 04-29-2012, 12:31 AM
tarks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Be careful what you all post. You all know that these posts are classed as off topic. Infractions can be handed out and the way points accumulate you could get a 6 month ban if you post enough.
  #8  
Old 04-29-2012, 01:16 AM
Stublerone Stublerone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 250
Smile

OSorry, but nearly every post of nearly any guy here is somehow off topic.

Discussion threads are there. But the last weeks, nearly 20 threads are opened just to express personal thinkings. Very few threads have something to do with the game. They just want to say thank you and open the next thread, which is totally senseless from the beginning or even gets unreadable and senseless after some posts.

Sorry, but it is getting a chatroom. Sorry to say that, but this is getting more and more.

This is my last post in this manner (be sure). But some guys, who are really discussing, bug tracking and statinfg or helping at problems cannot be heard here anymore.

Hopefully my next post will be a post with content, not with such nonsense, as I am currently writing. It is simply not important, that I open a thread with my name on it to say things with no constructive topics or fill it with answers, which were already asked.

Other forums will simply close such threads and will remind about the "search button".

Now I am finished!!!!! Hopefully forever..
  #9  
Old 04-29-2012, 01:24 AM
SG1_Lud's Avatar
SG1_Lud SG1_Lud is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
He definitely didn't deserve the ban.

People have to be responsible for their actions, he didn't do anything wrong, it's the act first-think later crowd which got what they deserved.
+1
  #10  
Old 04-29-2012, 07:59 AM
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
Default

Foo'bar may not have intentionally caused the stir he did, but why dredge up a topic that is within a week of the date (minus a year) to the date he posted? In other words why bump a May 4th, 2011 post on April 27 , 2012 - especially when the current patch is imminant? The last patch was October 2011. Why not bump that patch/topic? How far down the forum list did he have to go to get the post he did?

To me it's not about the people who downloaded the patch by accident. I agree a second or two looking at the date and the already numerous replys to a post (that had it been current to April 27th, 2012) would not have garnered as many replies as it already had.

Logically there's no reason to believe this was a current release of a new patch.

It's the juxtaposition of the two dates (4/27/12 - 5/4/11) combined with patch fever, (and let's be honest it's also the antagonistic character the forum has taken) that causes me suspicion. For someone to have been involved with CoD for as long as he has, I find it incredulous that he'd not know the atmosphere regarding this game.

I wish him well, and hope he will be back. Hopefully we've all learned something.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.