Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:45 AM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Fine thanks, I realised it was all getting too much and that a different approach was called for. To that end I will try and be supportive, not quarrelsome, and concentrate on the better underlying traits of this game...and its followers. In all honesty, they probably really do have the best interests of the game at heart, and are not as vituperative or cynical as I have been sometimes led to believe.

It is grey and windy here too, but where there is this forum, there is always a ray of sunshine. I like to think it harbours a diversity of views.

BTW, this is a genuine view, not an attempt at high sarcasm. I was reviewing my recent posts and came to this conclusion...

Last edited by Falstaff; 04-28-2012 at 09:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:48 AM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

The banana yellow does sting the eyes somewhat...
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:55 AM
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falstaff View Post
Fine thanks, I realised it was all getting too much and that a different approach was called for. To that end I will try and be supportive, not quarrelsome, and concentrate on the better underlying traits of this game...and its followers. In all honesty, they probably really do have the best interests of the game at heart, and are not as vituperative or cynical as I have been sometimes led to believe.

It is grey and windy here too, but where there is this forum, there is always a ray of sunshine. I like to think it harbours a diversity of views.

BTW, this is a genuine view, not an attempt at high sarcasm. I was reviewing my recent posts and came to this conclusion...
Why pisseth against the pricks, right?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:59 AM
theOden theOden is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 221
Default

In all honesty, it was pretty hilarious
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2012, 10:13 AM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is no point crying over spilt milk. The patch will be out when it's out and everyone is doign the best they can. The supporters are doign a good job of filtering out the critical noise, and allowing the devs to work in peace.

Sometimes you just have to assume the best, and not the worst.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-28-2012, 10:19 AM
Gamekeeper Gamekeeper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 190
Default

Prevention is always better than cure, old patch threads should have links removed or coded to be non clickable, should not be stickied and should be locked on release of later versions.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.