![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: Battle of France as add on? | |||
Yes, will buy this. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
55 | 58.51% |
OK, if for free. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 22.34% |
No, looking forward to Eastern front. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 19.15% |
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolf Rider said..
>> >>and some wonder why the sim was pushed out the door early (and the "we want it now" crowd then complain incessantly about it being "broken") << yes, that's right Falstaff... << Can anyone top this for legendary laughable lunacy? (Ptolemy was right....what Copernican revolution...?) I think it's going to take more than a sticking plaster to fix this logic.... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My crystal ball says:
Next info about the patch will be sth like ... "I have to tell you is very bad news ..." (hickups, artefacts, slowdowns... Be creative!) Save this post so you people can't pretend I haven't told you so. ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
well, unfortunately (for some) software RnD is like that... oh, if only this was a perfect world and all a programmer had to do was to pour a whole lot of letters, numbers, and punctuation marks into a hopper and then go around to the side and wind the "Make My programm" handle - churning out the perfect bug free program. Wouldn't that be just peachy?
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4 Stand alone Collector's Edition DCS Series Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound. Last edited by Wolf_Rider; 04-26-2012 at 07:14 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolf Rider said:
>>yes, again... that is correct<< You mean the customers forced the botched release...? As in your original point? Or are your revising this with a change of emphasis? I wouldn't blame you if you did. Your first point is so mental Mary it is not worth replying to. Ben |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolf Rider said:
>>well, unfortunately (for some) software RnD is like that... oh, if only this was a perfect world and all a programmer had to do was to pour a whole lot of letters, numbers, and punctuation marks into a hopper and then go around to the side and wind the "Make My programm" handle - churning out the perfect bug free program. Wouldn't that be just peachy? << Indeedy. But no-one has suggested that, however hard you try to mince their words in your happy hopper. Equally, programming may be art as well as science, but what about project management, scheduling, work-flow, and knowing-what-the-heck-you-and-your-programmers-are-doing-even-that-quiet-bloke-in-the-corner..? This forum always has a number of people telling everyone else how difficult it is to code a flight-sim, and bow their head in reverential silence, but people manage it. They also manage the project, the alpha-beta-release-candidate testing, the localisation and publishing etc etc Above all, the successful ones manage their customers to a greater or lesser extent. How you manage things when things go wrong is also telling. I suggest you flesh out your peach a little more. Ben |
![]() |
|
|