![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
you have been shown to be so unreliable and deliberately misleading in the past on numerous occasions, that anything you say on the ww2 era aircraft is meaningless
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Regardless of weather your right or wrong you come off sounding like a tool. You, and the people like you that go SO over the top when it comes to certain issues, discredit whatever point it is your trying to sell. Christ, take a break eh? Calm down, go get laid or SOMETHING! For the record, NZtyphoon actually did apologize and explained that he had a somewhat personal stake in the argument, but at least he recognized that things have gotten a little bit out of control. Seriously Zap, if you want people to listen, be a little less zealous and let the fact speak for themselves. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
S!
Zapatista, please calm down. You are crying like a kid with a lollipop pulled out of mouth. Do you really think ANY player of this GAME want it to be handicapped in any way, be it their favorite plane or not. I for sure don't. But by judging your outburst it seems you need every single thing that would give an I-WIN button over the German planes and psuhing that agenda with foam spewing. Really does not help it as said above. Slam the facts on the table and the devs figure the rest. Not a single "thread hundred+ pages of foaming about an agenda" will help. And even the game would simulate every single plane down to last rivet there would be someone to whine because they do not get same performance for some reason. So after all it is the pilot not the machine |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
You guys can argue back and forth about the performance of the FMs but just remember this, when the patch comes out I'm going up in a G50 and going to shoot you all down
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What....the UBER - G50???? LOL
__________________
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not this guy. I just want it to work offline!
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Will be interesting to see how the Spitfire performs below 3000m.
Some notes about the Bf 109 performance: Anyone else noticed that the "reference graph" of the Bf 109 are factory/manual data? They were not achieved during the actual flight test because the Bf 109 in the test was under-performing. The "reference graph" of the Spitfire is from a actual flight test, ironically again by a under-performing aircraft (speed dropped from 2800 RPM to 3000 RPM). In addition WEP of the Bf 109 was only allowed (possible?) for take-off and up to 1-1.5km. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some interesting graphs and historical quotes and references were posted here. Please make sure they are available at the bugtracker for easier access.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜberÜber ??? What are you guys talking and complaining about? I can´t hear all this complaining anymore. |
![]() |
|
|