![]() |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mustang, you have been attacked, but you answered back. That's your mistake.
And believe me, telling another people that they are nuts because they don't see THE truth, is not actually the way to better nothing, unless you are godsend to show mankind the light. And even then, only God will know, but you still have to convince mankind... And really, in your case God is not going to throw lightning bolts and whatever on miscreants... So why don't you try to offer the other chick as a more friendly approach? TD have never appeared here, so which attack is important and which not? More... everybody that matters here knows that MW50 is a cooling device. That was never the issue. But even so, the general plane dynamics, need to take into account, in which situations it was meant to be used, and if there was a needed plane attitude... So, the research is on the actual conditions in which it was engaged, not if the MW50 cooled the engine or not. But... if you get engaged on low speed combat, with your engine at max revs, and MW50 engaged, I do expect your engine to overheat, because the cooling system in general will have a lowered efficiency. This same concept applies to the SPits MkII with the 100 octane fuel. WEP is emergency... not dogfight power... So... why don't you start again from scratch and do the test of climbing with MW50 engaged and disengaged. And find if there is possible to reach higher altitudes faster with MW50 use, AND without overheating? Maybe you can come back with a better case. |
|
|