Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2012, 09:27 AM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker35M View Post
S!

Not to piss on your parade, but really tiring to read about this 100 octane all over the place. Sure it should enable 12lbs boost and whatever, but feels like most who want it think it is some kind of a wondersetting saving the world. 100oct fuel or not, engines still have limits..fuel does not turn them undestroyable
Agree, I'm also tired of seeing "100 octane" line everywhere. If you get shot down without 100 octane you will most likely be shot down with 100 octane too.
  #2  
Old 03-02-2012, 10:03 AM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Yes, +1 for the list, as it presents the most important present issues.
The list is good and i would like to see the answers too, but it also presents what's wrong about us all: everyone thinks their favorite issue is the most important issue.

For example, none of you mentioned anything about the inability to use bombers in the sim the way they are meant to be used.: the German ones have bugged bombsights and/or compasses, which make it impossible to use them the way they are supposed to (flying on autopilot via bombardier inputs from initial point to target and dropping as a group), while the Blenheim has some visibility issues in bombsight view that makes it hard to align with the target.

I don't want to rain on anyone's parade, i'd like to see the answers to those questions too, but just a little food for thought here to show you what's been bothering a lot of people for a long time: the loudest complaints are unfortunately the ones that get the spotlight and they tend to be long-term, difficult fixes, no matter if half the aircraft in the sim are almost unusable in their current state and they only need simple fixes like reversing a variable for a compass here and there.

What are all you fighter boys going to do with no bombers to escort or shoot down? Give us some bomber love too
  #3  
Old 03-02-2012, 01:44 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
......... everyone thinks their favorite issue is the most important issue.
...................
True. As long as they don't upgrade the 109 model before they upgrade the Spitfires I'll wait.

The biggest thing keeping a lot of guys from flying CoD is game/graphics performance/CTD. Fix that so more guys can play and we'll be on the up.

I know, I know... GUI, offline play, radio commands, FMB etc.. I believe it will all come, much of it is 'core' stuff that will be needed for the sequel.

Here's an irony, if the graphics update makes online playable while offline continues to be a problem, come and join us online. Exchange radio commands for real-time Teamspeak

btw, thanks BlackSix.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
  #4  
Old 03-02-2012, 11:27 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
Agree, I'm also tired of seeing "100 octane" line everywhere. If you get shot down without 100 octane you will most likely be shot down with 100 octane too.
I have to disagree.

In real life the aircraft performance was a minor fact as you write: the famous "it's the pilot, not the plane" was a factual sentence. A Bf109F4 pilot, even a great one, could be ambushed and taken down by a greater pilot in a hurricane. This because in an ambush the defender can't exploit the plane's performance.

Instead because of the limitations of the sim it's really difficult to be ambushed so every fight it's more a "plane vs plane" then a "pilot vs pilot" (think about the experience of the average pilot, he can it refly so he learns something at every KIA... the line between great pilot and average pilot is real thin).

I think it would be nice in a sim having the player choosing a plane because of its cockpit visibility than the 30km/h of more speed because of the different fuel.

Anyway I agree with th OP about the question...
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-02-2012 at 11:59 AM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.