![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() For example, none of you mentioned anything about the inability to use bombers in the sim the way they are meant to be used.: the German ones have bugged bombsights and/or compasses, which make it impossible to use them the way they are supposed to (flying on autopilot via bombardier inputs from initial point to target and dropping as a group), while the Blenheim has some visibility issues in bombsight view that makes it hard to align with the target. I don't want to rain on anyone's parade, i'd like to see the answers to those questions too, but just a little food for thought here to show you what's been bothering a lot of people for a long time: the loudest complaints are unfortunately the ones that get the spotlight and they tend to be long-term, difficult fixes, no matter if half the aircraft in the sim are almost unusable in their current state and they only need simple fixes like reversing a variable for a compass here and there. What are all you fighter boys going to do with no bombers to escort or shoot down? Give us some bomber love too ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The biggest thing keeping a lot of guys from flying CoD is game/graphics performance/CTD. Fix that so more guys can play and we'll be on the up. I know, I know... GUI, offline play, radio commands, FMB etc.. I believe it will all come, much of it is 'core' stuff that will be needed for the sequel. Here's an irony, if the graphics update makes online playable while offline continues to be a problem, come and join us online. Exchange radio commands for real-time Teamspeak ![]() btw, thanks BlackSix.
__________________
klem 56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds" http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/ ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
In real life the aircraft performance was a minor fact as you write: the famous "it's the pilot, not the plane" was a factual sentence. A Bf109F4 pilot, even a great one, could be ambushed and taken down by a greater pilot in a hurricane. This because in an ambush the defender can't exploit the plane's performance. Instead because of the limitations of the sim it's really difficult to be ambushed so every fight it's more a "plane vs plane" then a "pilot vs pilot" (think about the experience of the average pilot, he can it refly so he learns something at every KIA... the line between great pilot and average pilot is real thin). I think it would be nice in a sim having the player choosing a plane because of its cockpit visibility than the 30km/h of more speed because of the different fuel. Anyway I agree with th OP about the question...
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-02-2012 at 11:59 AM. |
![]() |
|
|