![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"The majority of Spitfire I testing at RAE etc was done pre 12 lb boost.You need to be very careful when analysing tests to match conditions to dates. Most tests done early were only at 6 1/4 and LOW weights, making those aircraft (March 1940) much faster. There was a steady drop off in speed as the marque progressed and the Mk II was slower again. What changed (and what was MUCH more important) was the climb rate. 2 pitch airscrews gave faster speeds than ROTOL (much lighter) but the climb was inferior. Given that climb to altitude was the main problem, the heavier props won out even though they delivered lower speeds. " As you also know, they do not take the Spitfire MkIX max 335mph max as an indication that their lower powered MkI is incorrect because the MkIX was much heavier and therefore presumably slower. To me its just more examples of just how complex these issues become without reference to specific configurations and perhaps the A2A configuration and results aren't relevant to what we are trying to get hold of: 100 octane CSP Spitfire Ia's of the BoB period July-October 1940. I think its best to leave it to the devs to come up with the correct data for the given configuration and loadouts from everything that is available 'out there', or more likely an amalgam of it. BlackSix has already said that the whole 100 octane/boost matter has been referred to Luthier for consideration.
__________________
klem 56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds" http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/ ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders Last edited by klem; 02-14-2012 at 12:55 PM. |
|
|