Quote:
Originally Posted by mazex
Wait - your'e calling me a sucker? What! 
Seriously - let's face the fact that the project got too long, they restarted it too many times and then the people funding it forced it out on the market a year before the developers where ready... So what do we as the small simulation community earn by "punishing" the team for that? Sure, they have probably made a lot of bad decisions to end up with a half finished product when the publisher pulled the blanket - but really, I spent $50 yesterday buying iRacing just to try it. That kind of money is not the end of the world, it it? It would be another thing if my new Audi would just break down and Audi said: "Sorry, we where forced to release it before it was done...". In this case let's be a bit forgiving with the poor sods over there in Russia working their asses of to continue delivering WWII simulators. How many others are there? |
Dude I won't blaming anyone if they fix CoD. If they take my money and move on after promising a fixed product, its a disgrace. It is actually false advertising. It was promised to be fixed. I just hope they fix it. No excuses.
I didn't buy CoD to get BoM. I'm not buying BoM to get CoD either. I want CoD as advertised (or even in the ballpark). Then I 'll consider buying BoM. There are a lot of CoD owners who feel the same way. And yes if you buy BoM and they don't fix CoD you are asking to get ripped off a second time and that would be a sucker.
If they fix CoD, then no worries.
02-13-2012, 03:19 PM
Threaded Mode