Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #301  
Old 02-04-2012, 07:46 PM
Pfeil Pfeil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 126
Default

I'm afraid that's not the way file extensions work. The extension does not determine the content of the file. In fact, it doesn't even determine the type of file it really is(In theory the header does, even though Windows uses the extension).

To make sure I'm not misinforming anyone, I tested your theory.
As I expected, recording an ntrk manually saves an ntrk file in a binary format. I.E. not a human readable plaintext file.
Saving a track at the end of a mission and renaming it to .ntrk however, doesn't even save as an ntrk extension.
.trk is automatically added to the filename you entered(I.E. test.ntrk.trk).
The resulting file is a text file with a structure similar to an FMB mission.

Edit:
I've noticed what appears to be a bug/inconsistency in the FMB: If the waypoint type is set to landing, both height and speed will be set to 0, when switching the type back to a normal waypoint, only height will be reset.
Speed will remain at 0(though will reset to the lowest speed possible for that type of aircraft if changed to anything below it, as is normal behavior).
This causes the aircraft to fall immediately after spawning(Engines running, can of course be recovered from if altitude is sufficient).

Also, if either an AI or player aircraft is spawned with only a single waypoint, set to landing, the aircraft will spawn on the ground with running engines.
As it is a landing waypoint, speed cannot be set.
Height can be set to any value and will only reset in certain cases to 12000m. However, this will not change the spawning altitude(It remains at 0).

Edit #2:
Not a true bug, but if the screenshot mode(ScreenshotType) is set to 2, a TGA and a Jpeg screenshot are saved with sequential filenames(grab0000.tga, grab0001.jpg). As these screenshots are the same image(with different compression/formatting) would it not make more sense for them to have the same name/number(I.E. grab0000.tga,grab0000.jpg)?
I'm assuming mode 2 calls functions for a tga screenshot and a jpeg screenshot in sequence, causing them to "see" the previous image, regardless of extension, and setting the number ++.
If possible, these could be integrated into a single function or made aware of extensions.

Last edited by Pfeil; 02-05-2012 at 02:19 PM. Reason: Added bug reports
Reply With Quote
  #302  
Old 02-06-2012, 10:19 PM
Luno13 Luno13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 370
Default

Hi,

There's a minor graphic bug with certain jetty and break-water objects.



The texture disappears at a certain distance.
Reply With Quote
  #303  
Old 02-07-2012, 02:43 AM
Aviar's Avatar
Aviar Aviar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pfeil View Post
I've noticed what appears to be a bug/inconsistency in the FMB: If the waypoint type is set to landing, both height and speed will be set to 0, when switching the type back to a normal waypoint, only height will be reset.
Speed will remain at 0(though will reset to the lowest speed possible for that type of aircraft if changed to anything below it, as is normal behavior).
This causes the aircraft to fall immediately after spawning(Engines running, can of course be recovered from if altitude is sufficient).

Also, if either an AI or player aircraft is spawned with only a single waypoint, set to landing, the aircraft will spawn on the ground with running engines.
As it is a landing waypoint, speed cannot be set.
Height can be set to any value and will only reset in certain cases to 12000m. However, this will not change the spawning altitude(It remains at 0).
Concerning the first point, if I remember correctly, it's been like that since day 1. That doesn't mean it couldn't be changed.

Concerning the second point, I believe some mission designers use this 'feature' to attain certain effects in a particular mission. I'm not sure what you would want changed and what you would hope to achieve that cannot be simulated through the FMB right now.

Aviar
__________________
Intel i7-4790 4-Core @3.60GHz
Asus Z97-C Motherboard
16GB DDR-3 1600 SDRAM @800 MHz
NVIDIA GTX 760 - 2GB
Creative SB ZX SBX
Logitech X-530 5.1 Speakers
27" AOC LED - 2752
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
CH FighterStick-Pro Throttle-Pro Pedals
Logitech G13 Gameboard
GoFlight GF-T8 Module
WIN 8.1
Reply With Quote
  #304  
Old 02-07-2012, 03:10 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luno13 View Post
Hi,

There's a minor graphic bug with certain jetty and break-water objects.



The texture disappears at a certain distance.
Does it also happen on Perfect?
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #305  
Old 02-07-2012, 12:34 PM
Aviar's Avatar
Aviar Aviar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 545
Default

Concerning the Hs 129 B-2. On the Arming screen, when choosing any loadout with either Mk 101 or Mk 103, neither Gunpod shows up on the picture. (See attached screenshots.)

Aviar
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Mk 101 Gunpod.jpg (993.8 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg Mk 103 Gunpod.jpg (994.4 KB, 13 views)
__________________
Intel i7-4790 4-Core @3.60GHz
Asus Z97-C Motherboard
16GB DDR-3 1600 SDRAM @800 MHz
NVIDIA GTX 760 - 2GB
Creative SB ZX SBX
Logitech X-530 5.1 Speakers
27" AOC LED - 2752
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
CH FighterStick-Pro Throttle-Pro Pedals
Logitech G13 Gameboard
GoFlight GF-T8 Module
WIN 8.1
Reply With Quote
  #306  
Old 02-07-2012, 12:49 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

Not a bug. Since the pod is part of the skin and can be skinned it unfortunately doesn't show up in the arming screen. In the mission it's there.
Reply With Quote
  #307  
Old 02-07-2012, 03:36 PM
Luno13 Luno13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
Does it also happen on Perfect?
I can't run perfect mode on this machine.
Reply With Quote
  #308  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:54 PM
-=MadCat=- -=MadCat=- is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 25
Default

Just noted an issue with the plane list in online missions.

If you add another plane to an already existing plane set, say 5 planes and you add a 6th one, the "new" plane doesn't fall in its usual place in the list.
Instead it gets just added at the end of the list.
In the plane list in FMB it orders just as usual and how everybody is used to, but contrary to that, in the actual mission itself it's as explained at the end of the list.

So far I wasn't able to work arount this, even to the point of stipping the entire plane set and readding the planes again one by one.
I have to admit though, I didn't build the entire mission again from scratch so don't know if that would "fix" it, but highly doubt that would be worth it.
Neither do I know if this is related to 4.11 or was there earlier.

Thx guys
Reply With Quote
  #309  
Old 02-08-2012, 01:29 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -=MadCat=- View Post
Just noted an issue with the plane list in online missions.

If you add another plane to an already existing plane set, say 5 planes and you add a 6th one, the "new" plane doesn't fall in its usual place in the list.
Instead it gets just added at the end of the list.
In the plane list in FMB it orders just as usual and how everybody is used to, but contrary to that, in the actual mission itself it's as explained at the end of the list.

So far I wasn't able to work arount this, even to the point of stipping the entire plane set and readding the planes again one by one.
I have to admit though, I didn't build the entire mission again from scratch so don't know if that would "fix" it, but highly doubt that would be worth it.
Neither do I know if this is related to 4.11 or was there earlier.

Thx guys
I've started to notice this recently and I suspect (although I haven't tested yet) that it only happens if you enable limited armament options. I forget the name of the exact checkbox but it's the one that lets you set plane limits for armaments and numbers. TBH I had dismissed this as me being a little bit too OCD... but if other people notice it then that changes things!
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #310  
Old 02-08-2012, 05:27 AM
Aviar's Avatar
Aviar Aviar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -=MadCat=- View Post
Just noted an issue with the plane list in online missions.

If you add another plane to an already existing plane set, say 5 planes and you add a 6th one, the "new" plane doesn't fall in its usual place in the list.
Instead it gets just added at the end of the list.
In the plane list in FMB it orders just as usual and how everybody is used to, but contrary to that, in the actual mission itself it's as explained at the end of the list.

So far I wasn't able to work arount this, even to the point of stipping the entire plane set and readding the planes again one by one.
I have to admit though, I didn't build the entire mission again from scratch so don't know if that would "fix" it, but highly doubt that would be worth it.
Neither do I know if this is related to 4.11 or was there earlier.

Thx guys

It seems as though Icefire is thinking you mean one thing and I am thinking you mean something totally different. So I am not sure now what you are saying.

Look at the first screenshot on the left. This is an Aircraft list for a coop mission. You can see how the flights are kind of scrambled...not in order. Is this what you are talking about? If so....read on.

If you look in your mis file near the top, you will see the flights listed here:

[Wing]
USA_BG_307z00
15AF_325FG_0HQ00
15AF_325FG_0HQ01
USA_BG_307z01
8AF_056FG_0HQ02
USA_BG_307z02
USA_BG_307z03
15AF_325FG_0HQ02
8AF_056FG_0HQ03
8AF_056FG_0HQ00
15AF_325FG_0HQ03


So, what I have been doing for many years is basically putting this list in the order that I want. You can take this list and make it look like this:

[Wing]
USA_BG_307z00
USA_BG_307z01
USA_BG_307z02
USA_BG_307z03
15AF_325FG_0HQ00
15AF_325FG_0HQ01
15AF_325FG_0HQ02
15AF_325FG_0HQ03
8AF_056FG_0HQ00
8AF_056FG_0HQ02
8AF_056FG_0HQ03


Now, look at the second screenshot. After you make the changes, this is what the Aircraft list in the coop will look like. I'm thinking that is more to your liking.

So the process is simply using Copy/Paste for individual flights and moving them to the position you want. Just be smart and make a copy of the mis file before making any edits. This way you have a backup in case you make any mistakes.

I do hope this has been a help to you. If I got it all wrong...oh well...maybe it will help someone else.

Aviar
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Flights Scrambled.jpg (1.06 MB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg Flights Together.jpg (1.06 MB, 29 views)
__________________
Intel i7-4790 4-Core @3.60GHz
Asus Z97-C Motherboard
16GB DDR-3 1600 SDRAM @800 MHz
NVIDIA GTX 760 - 2GB
Creative SB ZX SBX
Logitech X-530 5.1 Speakers
27" AOC LED - 2752
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
CH FighterStick-Pro Throttle-Pro Pedals
Logitech G13 Gameboard
GoFlight GF-T8 Module
WIN 8.1
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.