Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:58 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tickl3 View Post
Voicing an opinion is not throwing a tantrum.
And spending 2 minutes posting on a thread hardly means that someone has no hobbies or life outside of those 2 minutes. Interesting opinion.
I too shelved the game but the thing thats frustrating is that they have basically dropped it, without finishing it. Thats what has annoyed a lot of people.
Oh and dont forget that £40 may not be a lot to you but it is to others.
Dropped it? Nope. Not true.

Troll post reported.
  #2  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:04 PM
Tickl3 Tickl3 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Dropped it? Nope. Not true.

Troll post reported.
Read it again. It says BASICALLY dropped it.
Once again, having an opinion is not trolling.
Just because you disagree with what i say that means i should be banned or have my posts deleted? Isnt that the whole meaning of a forum? To discuss things and express opinions?
  #3  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:09 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

226 posts in 10 hours, most of it OT drivel.

How are we to find sensible questions and answers that are OT?

For god's sake lock the thread, BlackSix isn't likely to post anything more here that wouldn't be buried within two hours.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
  #4  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:18 PM
Urufu_Shinjiro's Avatar
Urufu_Shinjiro Urufu_Shinjiro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tickl3 View Post
Read it again. It says BASICALLY dropped it.
Once again, having an opinion is not trolling.
Just because you disagree with what i say that means i should be banned or have my posts deleted? Isnt that the whole meaning of a forum? To discuss things and express opinions?
Hmm, I guess I missed it the first read through, but going back and looking again I think I do see where the project is dropped, it says it right here:

Quote:
So our general status report is very simple. Everyone is working very hard doing the same thing they were doing a month or a year ago. Graphical programmers are working on graphics. Network programmers are combing through the network code. Plane modelers are building 3D models of aircraft. No one stopped. Nothing was abandoned. On the contrary, the team continues to grow.
Oh...wait...
__________________
CPU: Q6600 GO @3.6ghz
GPU: EVGA GTX570 SC
RAM: 2x2Gb DDR2 1066 4-4-4
HDD: 2x250Gb HDD RAID0
OS: Win7 Pro x64
Gear: TrackIR4 & G940
  #5  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:32 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urufu_Shinjiro View Post
Hmm, I guess I missed it the first read through, but going back and looking again I think I do see where the project is dropped, it says it right here:



Oh...wait...
according to Luthier ( a post in the past) they abondened the Battle of Britain scenario. No totaly new planes/cockpits, no ships for it.
I hope the RAF and RA planes wil get their FM and CEM corrections (the Lw planes are needed in thevBoM scenario ).
From Engine and GUI improvements both scenarios will get benefit - at least that is my understanding of 1C's development plan.
  #6  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:35 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

I agree with Franky. The basic engine work continues but the modelling work is concentrated on BoM. Unfortunately, if I may say so ... That means no Royal Navy warship, no further ships for the BoB scenario at all.
  #7  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:37 PM
Mango Mango is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 91
Default

While I can't deny that CloD is a mess and gives me no joy, the whining is like from small children who cannot accept reality.

Trivializing memory leaks and how soon it should be fixed shows you have no clue. The factory analogy is just thick... there is no "chain of production" when you're writing software.

Rant over, let me say "well put, Luthier". I have no love for the current product but I believe you and your team are doing your best to make it right. This I-16 pictures bring back some great memories!
  #8  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:38 PM
moilami moilami is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 169
Default

Wow, thanks of the update. The Rata is loads of fun to fly (or to shoot down)
  #9  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:45 PM
RazzyMan RazzyMan is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Default

B6, thanks for the feedback. Sounds Great! and well explained.
Just thought I'd let you know I realy enjoy the Il2 COD in its current state (in fact all Il2 offerings so far) and look forward to any improvements and expansions into the future.

By the way, if a Avro Lancaster could find its way into a future project then I would be even happier!!

Best wishes!



Quad core. 2.8 GHz + slight OC
6GB DDR3 RAM
GTX 560 Ti + OC to 1.1GHz
Win 7 64bit
  #10  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:18 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tickl3 View Post
Read it again. It says BASICALLY dropped it.
Once again, having an opinion is not trolling.
Just because you disagree with what i say that means i should be banned or have my posts deleted? Isnt that the whole meaning of a forum? To discuss things and express opinions?
Yes that's what a forum is for, so you expressed your oppinion and others expressed their oppinion on it, this just seems to turn people like you into bile spitting looneys who take things a step too far.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.