F-35 Carrier Test USS Wasp.

[TomcatViP]

Well if you are looking back at FAA past 40 years, the usage of a small carrier force was well theorized and efficiently put at work. Today Italy, Spain, India, Russia has gained from that "heritage".

Bigger carrier need to work in dual, with a wider backup crew force and logistic.

I fear that the move to bigger unit will lower the force effectiveness. I am not a pro VTOL but we hev seen in France that a single large unit does not provide as much deterrence as two smaller (and older). There is a strategical capacity loss despite all the top tech hardware that give a short tactical advantage.

If the carrier were build in a series such as it was envisioned at the beginning, the price gain would hve make a two carrier force possible and sustanaible. Now i'ts not. Hve a look to our flat top and how rusty it looks alrdy.

F4 stands for F4 Phantom K (with spey eng )

[JG53Frankyboy]

nice reading about the after war RN carrier 'drama'
http://navy-matters.beedall.com/cva01.htm

[bongodriver]

F4 stands for F4 Phantom K (with spey eng )

Ah OK....I didn't realise you were on a more historical theme, yes I know the UK variants of the Phantom.

[TomcatViP]

Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy

nice reading about the after war RN carrier 'drama'
http://navy-matters.beedall.com/cva01.htm

Thx!

[Sven]

Pretty impressive piece of engineering right there!

Good video quality as well, beautiful to see

[ATAG_Doc]

Nice video thanks for sharing.