Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old 12-23-2011, 03:20 AM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verhängnis View Post
From my understanding a dynamic stall is when the Wing (Airfoil) changes Angle of attack so dramatically that the leading edge creates turbulent, fast moving airflows (Vortex's) which travel over the top of the wing created an increased lower pressure momentarily increasing lift cooeficient but once the vortex has passed the wing incurs a normal stall where there is not enough airflow over the airfoil to generate lift.
That follows the wiki definition I provided a few pages back.. but the wiki also included a reference for that [22] which expanded on that definition to point out that a lot of the dynamic part of it had to do with the dynamic nature of the atmosphere (wind vector)..

So it appears that an accelerated and dynamic stall share the following

1) load factor > 1g
2) stalls at higher speeds than normal stall speed (1g LF)

And what sets them apart is simply the rate of change in the AoA.. Which is probably why they call it dynamic?

But both will stall at the same critical AoA.. Just the dynamic will experience a brief increase in lift just before the stall.. due to the vortex movement.

So the question is how brief is brief?

Are we talking tens of seconds or tens of Millie seconds? If the later, than it is not worth adding the additional math to simulate the brief increase in lift because it will go un-noticed to the sim pilot. That is to say, in the real world an instrumented plane under test might notice (log the data) the Millie second spike of increased lift.. But the human won't.. So no need to simulate it IMHO.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.