Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2011, 12:28 PM
Zorin Zorin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar View Post
That may have happend occationally, and will happen so in game. The gunners are not perfect and there is also dispersion for bullets. In case you can race with your fighter all through a box of bombers, its possible, that a very few bullets of gunners will hit nearby friendly planes. But its not as much as before anymore.
What I meant was, I have a recording of a mission that shows a bomber formation that is being attack by fighters. Some fighters are hit and explode. What will happen if I replay the same recording in 4.11. Obviously, the bombers would not have scored all the hits neccessary to destroy the attacking fighters in question. So will they keep flying even though the recording does not have further information about their movement as they were destroyed originally?
  #2  
Old 12-15-2011, 02:54 PM
T}{OR's Avatar
T}{OR T}{OR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 833
Default

Friendly fire did happen and it was deadly when it did. Though no where near as we have it in 4.10.1. I can not wait for 4.11.

Just one more question: do G forces affect gunners now? I used to get hit by a gunner from a torn up bomber spinning and spiraling down to the mother Earth, and I don't even want to mention tail gunners...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorin View Post
What I meant was, I have a recording of a mission that shows a bomber formation that is being attack by fighters. Some fighters are hit and explode. What will happen if I replay the same recording in 4.11. Obviously, the bombers would not have scored all the hits neccessary to destroy the attacking fighters in question. So will they keep flying even though the recording does not have further information about their movement as they were destroyed originally?
Someone correct me please, but... IIRC this was a problem with old track recording system. The current one is just that - a recording. And the old one (.ntrk or .trk, I can't remember) replayed the mission as if you were playing on autopilot.
__________________

LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron
'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories

Last edited by T}{OR; 12-16-2011 at 05:29 PM.
  #3  
Old 12-15-2011, 08:29 PM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

I see. Yes, there are many problems with the old 'track' format. We try to erase all things from the recording/saving algorythm, that may suffer from changings. Randomisation is a big bugger here. On the other side, we know, 'track' format is a dead horse in fact, there is no help, it will never again work properly. 1C maddox probably came to the same conclusion and thus made a different recording format, that works on all circumstances, namely 'ntrack'.

As T}{OR said, 'track' format is no real recording, its just replaying with the same initial settings. The advantage is, it is small, but since the game has evolved, the 'butterfly effect' have become a much bigger problem.
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
  #4  
Old 12-15-2011, 09:42 PM
Luno13 Luno13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 370
Default

Additionally, in the earliest Il-2 versions, the Training tracks would allow the player to take-over.

That was broken and never fixed once FMs and DMs started changing.

Sometimes you just have to let go of a good idea to allow for further progress in other fronts.

However, it would be nice if we could set automatic .ntrk recording. Often I don't save a track unless something interesting happened, and with the current .ntrk system you have to plan ahead when to record. (Of course you can record everything, but sifting through non-descriptive "0001.ntrk" and "0002.ntrk" etc. after a few online sorties isn't fun)

Last edited by Luno13; 12-15-2011 at 09:45 PM.
  #5  
Old 12-16-2011, 12:29 AM
kennel kennel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luno13 View Post
Additionally, in the earliest Il-2 versions, the Training tracks would allow the player to take-over.

That was broken and never fixed once FMs and DMs started changing.

Sometimes you just have to let go of a good idea to allow for further progress in other fronts.

However, it would be nice if we could set automatic .ntrk recording. Often I don't save a track unless something interesting happened, and with the current .ntrk system you have to plan ahead when to record. (Of course you can record everything, but sifting through non-descriptive "0001.ntrk" and "0002.ntrk" etc. after a few online sorties isn't fun)
You can allready assign a key so you can start recording when ever you want, is this what you are refering to is are you thinking of somthing else?
When I want to record I have assigned it to my enter key
  #6  
Old 12-16-2011, 06:58 AM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

He means, saving like an old track file - after a mission with custom naming. I don't know, if it is possible.
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
  #7  
Old 12-16-2011, 11:53 AM
MrBaato MrBaato is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 52
Default

Any update on the G55?
  #8  
Old 12-16-2011, 03:18 PM
jermin jermin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

When will get the update?
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves
regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place?


  #9  
Old 12-17-2011, 12:55 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jermin View Post
When will get the update?
+1
  #10  
Old 12-17-2011, 01:20 PM
76.IAP-Blackbird 76.IAP-Blackbird is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 167
Default

when its done
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.