![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
CoD planes, maps, etc will be included in the next release. That is the formula that 1C used with IL-2 and it worked well, so I don't see why they would just toss all those planes and maps
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ilya seems like a good guy with a great personality. The negativity is incredible here. IL2 Cliffs of Dover is visually and technically excellent. And the problems you speak of are far from deal breakers. I think people spend to much time posting here and not enough acctually playing the game to have an idea about what they are talking about.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Hmmm my wingmen is badly damaged ill send him home......Ooops no i cant, you guess the reason why? I prefer the SP side i dont play MP and the radio thing IS a DEAL BREAKER for me pure and simple. We all have opinions and that is mine ![]() But i thank the OP for his post. news is better than no news and i hope he keeps it up. Regards |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Aye, but will support for the BoB aspect continue? As it stands, it's arguably the most inferior off-line representation of Battle of Britain on the market (in terms of air-combat-simulation). There is nothing that immerses you in the battle. It's not a simulation; it's a technical representation. I seriously hope this game manifests (offline) into something at least as immersive as BoB2. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Everyone is clear what sequels are right. Not new games but addons to the existing game to make it fuller. Like Forgotten Battles got. About five times it's original size.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That depeonds on your definition of 'support'
If your definition of support is 'reasonable' and means you will get all the new features that BS mentioned, than the answer is yes. Assming 1C does what they have allways done (read track record) and include all the planes, maps, etc from thier previous version into their next version (read sqeual) If your definition of support is 'unreasonable' and means you expect every plane, boat, train, car, wagon, ice cream stand that was aval in the real world during the summer of BoB.. Than the answer is most likly no Quote:
Disagree 100% Well.. retract that.. maybe true for you, but surly not for all What? See above
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know.. and my responce to you on each of your statments took that into account
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
![]() |
|
|