Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2011, 06:27 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
I will this time around, last time I had faith in MG from all their years of great work on IL-2. I wouldn't worry too much though, I'm sure it will be a Forgotten Battles type of deal, I mean, seriously they wouldn't try to sell us a brand new stand-alone game while dropping support for CLoD. The outrage would make the original CloD release pale in comparison.
Based on the 1C track record..

CoD planes, maps, etc will be included in the next release.

That is the formula that 1C used with IL-2 and it worked well, so I don't see why they would just toss all those planes and maps
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2011, 06:31 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Based on the 1C track record..

CoD planes, maps, etc will be included in the next release.

That is the formula that 1C used with IL-2 and it worked well, so I don't see why they would just toss all those planes and maps
If that's the case then I'm a happy camper.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2011, 06:42 PM
SIDWULF SIDWULF is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 86
Default

Ilya seems like a good guy with a great personality. The negativity is incredible here. IL2 Cliffs of Dover is visually and technically excellent. And the problems you speak of are far from deal breakers. I think people spend to much time posting here and not enough acctually playing the game to have an idea about what they are talking about.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2011, 12:55 AM
Havoc04 Havoc04 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIDWULF View Post
Ilya seems like a good guy with a great personality. The negativity is incredible here. IL2 Cliffs of Dover is visually and technically excellent. And the problems you speak of are far from deal breakers. I think people spend to much time posting here and not enough acctually playing the game to have an idea about what they are talking about.
I noticed sir you didn't add sound wise, VERY clever.. for with the radio broken not being able to do/give radio commands to wing men and the abhorrent sounds that came with the game is a deal breaker.
Hmmm my wingmen is badly damaged ill send him home......Ooops no i cant, you guess the reason why? I prefer the SP side i dont play MP and the radio thing IS a DEAL BREAKER for me pure and simple. We all have opinions and that is mine

But i thank the OP for his post. news is better than no news and i hope he keeps it up.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-09-2011, 06:43 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Based on the 1C track record..

CoD planes, maps, etc will be included in the next release.

That is the formula that 1C used with IL-2 and it worked well, so I don't see why they would just toss all those planes and maps

Aye, but will support for the BoB aspect continue? As it stands, it's arguably the most inferior off-line representation of Battle of Britain on the market (in terms of air-combat-simulation). There is nothing that immerses you in the battle. It's not a simulation; it's a technical representation. I seriously hope this game manifests (offline) into something at least as immersive as BoB2.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-09-2011, 06:51 PM
Richie's Avatar
Richie Richie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,450
Default

Everyone is clear what sequels are right. Not new games but addons to the existing game to make it fuller. Like Forgotten Battles got. About five times it's original size.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09-2011, 06:56 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
Aye, but will support for the BoB aspect continue?
That depeonds on your definition of 'support'

If your definition of support is 'reasonable' and means you will get all the new features that BS mentioned, than the answer is yes. Assming 1C does what they have allways done (read track record) and include all the planes, maps, etc from thier previous version into their next version (read sqeual)

If your definition of support is 'unreasonable' and means you expect every plane, boat, train, car, wagon, ice cream stand that was aval in the real world during the summer of BoB.. Than the answer is most likly no

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
As it stands, it's arguably the most inferior off-line representation of Battle of Britain on the market (in terms of air-combat-simulation).
Disagree 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
There is nothing that immerses you in the battle.
Disagree 100%

Well.. retract that.. maybe true for you, but surly not for all

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
It's not a simulation; it's a technical representation.
What?

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
I seriously hope this game manifests (offline) into something at least as immersive as BoB2.
See above
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2011, 09:09 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
That depeonds on your definition of 'support'

If your definition of support is 'reasonable' and means you will get all the new features that BS mentioned, than the answer is yes. Assming 1C does what they have allways done (read track record) and include all the planes, maps, etc from thier previous version into their next version (read sqeual)

If your definition of support is 'unreasonable' and means you expect every plane, boat, train, car, wagon, ice cream stand that was aval in the real world during the summer of BoB.. Than the answer is most likly no


Disagree 100%


Disagree 100%

Well.. retract that.. maybe true for you, but surly not for all


What?


See above
I'm talking OVERALL simulation here. CloD is technically amazing in many departments; but it doesn't feel like the BoB. Maybe it's a British thing, but there is nothing in the off-line department to immerse you in the day-to-day routine that was the BoB. BoB2 does this perfectly, and even when you remove the dynamic campaign that BoB2 has, the AI and the missions all equate to an experience which is far more immersive. This is just one of the reasons why I hope that CloD is not just a small stepping stone in the team's road of expansion. It would be sad for them to neglect the areas of CloD which they have failed to cover/improve/develop (be it graphical or relative to gameplay).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-09-2011, 09:21 PM
smink1701 smink1701 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
I'm talking OVERALL simulation here. CloD is technically amazing in many departments; but it doesn't feel like the BoB. Maybe it's a British thing, but there is nothing in the off-line department to immerse you in the day-to-day routine that was the BoB. BoB2 does this perfectly, and even when you remove the dynamic campaign that BoB2 has, the AI and the missions all equate to an experience which is far more immersive. This is just one of the reasons why I hope that CloD is not just a small stepping stone in the team's road of expansion. It would be sad for them to neglect the areas of CloD which they have failed to cover/improve/develop (be it graphical or relative to gameplay).
1++ If there was a way to get IL2's functionality, BOB2's immersion and CLoD's graphics.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-09-2011, 09:31 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
I'm talking OVERALL simulation here.
I know.. and my responce to you on each of your statments took that into account
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.