Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2011, 12:15 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharveL View Post
It's BS because of logic not e-peening because:

A) Editing his post from 125fps down is much more evidence of e-peening as you like to call it. Sounds to me like he compared his worst frame rate over London to an open sky view post driver install with a bunch of video settings changes thrown in to get his 800% improvement. Nobody is getting an average fps of 125fps. Starting to sound more like BS (or a bad case of apples and oranges) to you now?

B) nobody else is getting even close to that kind of improvement in this thread with the driver change.

Try using your noodle instead of assuming anyone gives a crap if someone else is getting great frame rates out of jealousy or whatever.

Seriously think first then post. I'm sure the OP can manage the responses just fine on his own.
First of all I didn't see his 125fps - which he had obviously already edited to 75 'due to misprint'. People make mistakes. You can surely believe 75 can't you? Mine's 60 clamped to my monitor refresh and would be much higher if it wasn't.

He also didn't come on here bragging, he offered the info with a kindly "I may have good news for you".

I have no reason to disbelieve what he says, it sounds reasonable to me and who are you to decide how he compared his results? In any case his current situation is clear, believable and offers some possibility to others who will give a crap if it helps them, more than your arrogant 'slam the door in his face' attitude.

We are supposed to be helping eachother on this forum not kicking someone just because you want to feel big about yourself.

As for him looking after himself, I'm sure he can but this is about me having had a gutful of negative knockers like you. If you can't find something constructive or helpful to say keep quiet.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders

Last edited by klem; 10-31-2011 at 12:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2011, 12:46 PM
droz droz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 127
Default

I'm still looking for video or pics.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2011, 01:26 PM
katdogfizzow katdogfizzow is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by droz View Post
I'm still looking for video or pics.
Yeah OP is obviously confused unless there is some magical way the sim runs perfectly on his unique old world setup....which means everybody will need to downgrade to his rig which is running perfectly...which logically seems mathematically improbable

Sounds like maybe he is getting 60fps outside the plane over the channel sure...

But 60fps over London with bombers and clouds while in the cockpit and trackir? There is no way with that setup....obviously. Perhaps he just excitedly posted the improvement without really testing over London with planes, etc.

Last edited by katdogfizzow; 10-31-2011 at 01:30 PM. Reason: beleive me, id love to be wrong
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2011, 04:00 PM
CharveL CharveL is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klem View Post
First of all I didn't see his 125fps - which he had obviously already edited to 75 'due to misprint'. People make mistakes. You can surely believe 75 can't you? Mine's 60 clamped to my monitor refresh and would be much higher if it wasn't.

He also didn't come on here bragging, he offered the info with a kindly "I may have good news for you".

I have no reason to disbelieve what he says, it sounds reasonable to me and who are you to decide how he compared his results? In any case his current situation is clear, believable and offers some possibility to others who will give a crap if it helps them, more than your arrogant 'slam the door in his face' attitude.

We are supposed to be helping eachother on this forum not kicking someone just because you want to feel big about yourself.

As for him looking after himself, I'm sure he can but this is about me having had a gutful of negative knockers like you. If you can't find something constructive or helpful to say keep quiet.
Ok, deep breath...

I think you're getting too worked up about this and reading far more into it than is there. I call BS on the numbers for the simple reason that it is way too big a jump for a driver upgrade and the other responses corroborate.

You're assuming I'm just trying to be a dick about it and I'm not. I think we're all smart enough to figure out the disparity is from other things than a magical 800% jump in frame rate from a driver update so I felt no need to expand on that just to cushion yours or the OP's sensibilities. I'm sure he's a big boy and can take it without getting butthurt and I know you have the best intentions to shield him.

It's all good!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.