Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-26-2011, 04:43 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

For those, like me, who couldn't read the list

Code:
Plane        front   side   belly    front       side       belly	
bf109g6      7,9      9,9     23     85,03      106,56     247,56
spit mk1      8       11,3    28     86,11      121,63     301,38
He 111      17,2      36,5    124    185,13     392,88     1334,72
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26-2011, 05:03 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

This thread is very interesting, I like the quantitative arguments. Manu and Tamat show a big love for CloD, otherwise they would not take the time and pain to do all the research, math and graphs .
My only concern is that probably the developers will drop all this good work down the pipe.

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2011, 05:07 PM
Kodoss Kodoss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 262
Default

If it doesn't comes is this sim, then maybe in the next one
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-26-2011, 05:51 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodoss View Post
If it doesn't comes is this sim, then maybe in the next one
This opinion takes much, much, much optimism, as insubers opinion takes pessimism.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-26-2011, 07:41 PM
Kodoss Kodoss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 262
Default

It shouldn't be so complicated to let the cpu do some small calculations for the visibility and use it for the distance DOT.

For the distance where the dot becomes a model, you could use the box of the whole A/C and calculate the angle according to the resolution and FOV.
Also add a softer change from dot to model, by putting them on top of each other until the model becomes bigger than 6 dots in length equal which angle (horizontal/vertical).

And to free it from "I can see you clearer in 640x480 Res" just make it lesser visible to the background (contrast) according to resolution. Which means the higher the Res, the higher the visibility one tiny dot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.