![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Besides the fanboy talk, there's some rumor getting more substantive: CFS3 is coming and its the most probable reason for the information war going on between CFS and BoB. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just think it's hilarious as that was posted back in 2002
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello von G.
The Revi was offset to the right to gain a better forward view. To aim correctly it was sufficient to close the left eye. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
So it's off to the side to give an unobstructed view and for right eye aiming?
Any sources on this? I have to wonder, if putting the sights off to the right like that was such a good idea, why didnt any other airforces do it? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sources, in books yes. Maybe you can find something on the web.
Why didn't other airforces think of this? Frankly I don't know. If you ask me, it's one of those oddities of german engineering |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK I may have found an explanation in the most unlikely place, a patent for the target reticle on telescopic sights believe it or not, but I am still not a 100% convinced this why the sights are offset.
Source: http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?...7&DISPLAY=DESC Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmm...
That's interesting but it seems to be describing the offset of the projectiles nose, rather than the sight. It seems the right eye thing, and keeping the view of the nose open are the best potential answers, although frankly neither one seems like an especially strong reason. Maybe as KOM.nausicaa says, the germans just feel a need to be different! |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought the pilot had the option to mount the sight on the left if that was his dominant eye?
__________________
My whole life, all I've wanted to do is fly. Bomb stuff. Shoot people down. - - Topper Harley |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But the thing that doesn't convince me of this idea being reason for offsetting the gun sight, is that I think the effect of this drift on weapons with a convergence of 300m or even 500m would be very minimal, and also the fact that allied planes had the sight in the centre. I'm leaning towards KOM.Nausicaa descriptions. Last edited by Codex; 01-19-2008 at 10:57 PM. |
![]() |
|
|