Arguments, speculations, rants and generally off-topic/repetitive topics megathread

Sternjaeger II · #1 08-06-2011, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zorin

Good for you, but I have to admit that for me they lost about 90% of it already. Please keep in mind they have "developed" this game for 5+ years! Both of the last expansion packs were mostly developed by third party companies and the only thing they needed to do was the implementation of new planes and maps, which we know now since the "MOD" incident, is not as complicated to do as they wanted us to believe.

The very fact that someone from the community (me) had to tell them that their Bf110 that they happily showcased in dev updates had a number of OBVIOUS flaws should have made me very suspicious. How can a company that has spent the last decade on the subject matter of WWII aviation get something like that wrong? It is beyond me. That 3D guy must have looked at hundreds of photographs of Bf110Cs and, as we were let to believe!, original blueprints. I'd have fired him on the spot!

Zorin,what was the problem with the 110 exactly?

robtek · #2 08-06-2011, 09:09 AM

A misplaced antenna and pitot tube, afaik.
Monumental errors that would have destroyed the gameplay for everyone.

Sternjaeger II · #3 08-06-2011, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robtek

A misplaced antenna and pitot tube, afaik.
Monumental errors that would have destroyed the gameplay for everyone.

Sorry Robtek,I dont understand the reason for your sarcasm,why can't u keep it civilised?

Zorin · #4 08-06-2011, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robtek

A misplaced antenna and pitot tube, afaik.
Monumental errors that would have destroyed the gameplay for everyone.

You are pretty daft, aren't you? Completely unable to grasp the actual fact that is lying within such obvious mistakes. If they already fail at the obvious, do we really want to know(we do know actually) what has been messed up behind the visuals?

6S.Manu · #5 08-06-2011, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zorin

If they already fail at the obvious, do we really want to know(we do know actually) what has been messed up behind the visuals?

I totally agree with this quote. They say "detailed FMs and DMs"... the engine who manages them can be good, but if the guys put wrong data in it can we really call this a sim? And this goes on since the old IL2.

I don't trust them anymore. For that I would like to have excellent engines (graphical, FM, DM ect...) but above all a SDK to correct the data so I can sim with my preferred community.