Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Communication poll
Very happy, the developers will communicate when ready, im happy to wait. 21 11.17%
i would like to get a update more often but im not worried 66 35.11%
The communication has been poor and not what i would expect, not very happy. 40 21.28%
Communication is terrible and its affecting how i feel about the developers and COD 61 32.45%
Voters: 188. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 07-16-2011, 07:41 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Wrong. In spite of what moaners say and post, the game can easily be enjoyable as it is playable and scalable. They never acknowledge it. Just say the game`s broken and that`s that. Yes, it is broken, but what does that say really? The truth is that it`s not all bad like complainers love to post. Many people (that rarely get so vocal about it, maye because they`re playing the game instead) don`t even have to try to get fun out of this product. But you ofcourse tend to say it`s completely broken, which is lying to those not able to check what state the game is in.
And stop saying the whines are good in any way. They aren`t.



Which doesn`t mean that it`s not worth the price or unplayable. You will never find a post with me saying there isn`t a sound bug but I don`t even need to search for posts which daily lie that the game is unplayable.
This forum will not affect sales to the degree you suggest. Poor reviews will, but not posts on a forum aimed at a niche market of simmers (who all knew what CloD was before it hit the market).
Furbs is not directly saying the game is terrible; rather that it could be so much better (and we were under the impression it would be so much better on the day of release; such information is irrefutable. Don't be naive).
Many can enjoy the game, but it depends on what you are after; a sterile simulation of some of the A/C in the BoB or an actual simulation of the battle itself. The former has easily been achieved, but the latter not so much. Indeed, for onliners the online game is largely broken now, so it is easy to see why Furbs is struggling to play the game. But he wants to play the game! He wouldn't post here and send the team useful information on 1940's houses if we wanted the game to fail. What you mistake as pointless moaning is, in fact, moaning with the incentive that his moaning has been caused by the state of the sim which, as I said, could be so much better.

I don't see why you care so much. Luthier was thick skinned enough to admit the game was in a terrible state on release, and he is not enough of a drama queen to get his knickers in a twist over some posts on an internet forum.

But thankyou, Car-Guy, for entertaining me with your hypocritical nonsense about who can post what, when and where. And your moaning about moaners is second to none. Leave them be, and the environment would be a lot more peaceful.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.