A good idea on the performance issues

[jg27_mc]

Voted yes. IMHO it will reward those who fly with discipline and appropriate tactics/team work, and can potentially punish the remaining people...

Originally Posted by Redroach

...But, let's face it: That would mean thousands of threads like "WTF? Same plane outclimbing me! BUG!" for years to come...

It could be optional. Wonder woman servers Off, realistic ones On. (it could be written on the server description/messages as well)

Regards.

Originally Posted by jg27_mc

Voted yes. IMHO it will reward those who fly with discipline and appropriate tactics/team work, and can potentially punish the remaining people...



It could be optional. Wonder woman servers Off, realistic ones On. (it could be written on the server description/messages as well)

Regards.

Indeed. It would bring back a lot of balance in the realism,cos ppl would have to treat their planes properly and learn to read the signs of problems.

[pupo162]

Originally Posted by Bloblast

I would like to have engine failures. Very realistic I would say.
One you can add as an option for realism.

But the basic for CoD must first be all right.

if it works as i think its just a matter of putting in some numbers. work for 10 minutes. i will try and mod it this night.

[JG52Krupi]

If i recall engine failures were modeled so they just need to activate unless someone heard different?

whoa whoa guys, one thing is statistics, another is made up bollocks..

We're just talking about a machine performance issue here, which can vary normally, no historically related performance issues..

truth is that whiners will always find a reason to whine, if we have to worry about whiners then it's not even worth developing the game any further.

We need to think in terms of solid development to improve realism here, not of what people might think because it looked different in the movie Pearl Harbour..

[Redroach]

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

If i recall engine failures were modeled so they just need to activate unless someone heard different?

geez, why do I even bother to type a single letter? sigh

[JG52Krupi]

Originally Posted by Redroach

geez, why do I even bother to type a single letter? sigh

Sorry should have quoted you for the truth.

Does it work in FMB, like the other settings do?

[gelbevierzehn]

I would say YES..

But you have to acquire the higher perfomance.

For example:
If you rub with your mouse at least 2 hours over the skin of your 109, you'll earn the extra 5km/h top speed from the freshly polished airframe.

[DB605]

Originally Posted by gelbevierzehn

I would say YES..

But you have to acquire the higher perfomance.

For example:
If you rub with your mouse at least 2 hours over the skin of your 109, you'll earn the extra 5km/h top speed from the freshly polished airframe.

lol that's actually good idea too!
Back to topic, i voted yes.

[pupo162]

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

If i recall engine failures were modeled so they just need to activate unless someone heard different?

i believe you are right. there is a parameter for engine failure probability in all engine DM, but all are set to 0%. im about to teste what happens if increse the odds to ... lets say... 100%